Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2

Kalapotharakos 2005.

Methods RCT 
 Method of randomisation: not reported 
 Assessor blinding: yes 
 Participant blinding: not reported 
 Loss to follow‐up: 1 in the high resistance group, 1 in the control group 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no 
 Post‐program follow up: no
Participants Location: Greece 
 N = 12‐ HI; N = 12‐MI; N = 11‐control 
 Sample: healthy, inactive but independent living older adults 
 Age: HI‐mean 64.6 years (SD = 5.1); MI‐mean 65.7 years (SD = 4.2) 
 Inclusion criteria: non smokers, free of medication, no symptoms of cardiovascular, orthopedic, or neuromuscular disease, and physically inactive before 
 Exclusion criteria: MMSE < 24, depression (GDS > 5)
Interventions PRT (high intensity and moderate intensity) versus control 
 1. PRT 
 Type of Ex: 4UL/2 LL 
 Equipment: Universal gym machines 
 Intensity: high intensity group: 80% of 1 RM; moderate intensity group: 60% of 1 RM 
 Frequency: Ex3 
 Reps/Sets: 8/3 for high intensity group; 15/ 3 for moderate intensity group 
 Duration: 12 weeks 
 Setting: not reported 
 Supervision: not reported 
 Adherence: 98.5% 
 2. Control Group: no exercise
Outcomes Muscle strength (1‐RM) 
 6‐min walk 
 Chair rise 
 Vertical jump 
 1‐leg standing time, 
 Walking speed 
 Stair climb 
 Comments on adverse events: no
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear