Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2

Maiorana 1997.

Methods RCT 
 Method of randomisation: not reported 
 Assessor blinding: no 
 Participant blinding: no 
 Loss to follow‐up: 5 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no 
 Post‐program follow up: no
Participants Location: Australia 
 N = 31 
 Sample: men at least 3 months after coronary bypass 
 Age: mean 61.2 years (SD 8.4) in training group 
 Inclusion criteria: male, at least 3 months after coronary artery bypass surgery, low risk for recurrent cardiac events (normal left ventricular function, no residual ischemia, and an exercise capacity exceeding 4 metabolic equivalents during graded exercise testing) 
 Exclusion criteria: not in an exercise rehabilitation programme at time of recruitment, moderate/severe left ventricular function, valve replacement/repair, history of CHF, on beta‐blocking medication, significant resting hypertension (systolic BP >160mmHg or diastolic 100 mmHg) angina or significant ST depression during graded exercise testing
Interventions PRT versus control 
 1. PRT 
 Type of Ex: 7UL, 4LL, 1 Tr 
 Equipment: machines, dumb‐bells 
 Intensity: 40% of MVC at beginning or program, 60% by end 
 Frequency: Ex3 
 Reps/Sets: 10‐15/3 
 Duration: 10 weeks 
 Setting: gym 
 Supervision: full 
 Adherence: all subjects completed at least 80% of sessions (excluding drop‐outs) 
 2. Control Group: maintain current physical activity habits
Outcomes Strength (1RM) 
 Aerobic capacity (Peak VO2 on treadmill test) 
 Self‐efficacy 
 Comments on adverse events: yes (safety an aim of study)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear