Table 1.
Variable | (1) Cox & Miles Table 5, col. 1 |
(2) Cox & Miles Table 5, col. 2 |
(3) Cox & Miles Table 5,col. 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Judge was Democratic Appointee | .145** (.035) | .151** (.039) | .158** (.044) |
Judge was Democratic Appointee * Year After 1994 | - | - | .004 (.06) |
Year Was After 1994 | -.123** (.035) | - | - |
Case Occurred in South | .016 (.043) | - | - |
Appellate Case | -.084 (.038) | -.102* (.042) | -.101** (-.053) |
Challenge to At-large Election | .104 (.049) | .078 (.054) | .077 (.055) |
Challenge to Reapportionment Plan | .054 (.049) | .034 (.055) | .034 (.055) |
Challenge to Local Election Practice | .005 (.043) | -.018 (.05) | -.018 (.05) |
Plaintiffs Were African-American | .027 (.046) | .114* (.049) | .114** (.049) |
Case Occurred in Jurisdiction Covered by §5 | .046 (.044) | .045 (.05) | .044 (.055) |
Note:
indicates significant P<.10 and
indicates significant at P<.05. With the exception of Model (1), all regression include fixed-effects controls for judicial circuits and years.