Table 2. Cox and Miles (2008), Table 6, Columns 1-3 Reporting Probit Findings on the Likelihood of Voting for Section 2 Liability.

Variable	(1) Cox & Miles Table 6, col. 1	(2) Cox & Miles Table 6, col. 4	(3) Cox & Miles Table 6, col. 5	(4) Cox & Miles Table 6, col. 6
Judge was Democratic Appointee	.125** (.04)	.140** (.037)	.166** (.039)	.155** (.038)
Judge was African-American	.300** (.09)	-	-	-
Judge was Female	-.020 (.056)	-	-	-
Age	-	.003 (.002)	-	-
Judge Attended Ivy League College	-	-	.018 (.051)	-
Judge Attended Elite Law School	-	-	-.078* (.041)	-
Judge Previously Served as Law Clerk	-	-	.016 (.044)	-
Judge Previously Served in State Leg or Exec Branch	-	-	-	.021 (.039)
Judge Previously Served on State Court	-	-	-	-.056 (.040)
Judge Previously Served in Federal Leg. or Exec. Branch	-	-	-	.002 (.04)

Note:

^*means significant P<.10 and

^**indicates significant at P<.05. The regressions include the same controls as in Model (2) of Table 5: controls for whether the case occurred in a jurisdiction covered by section 5, whether the case was an appeal, whether the plaintiffs were African-American, whether the challenge was to an at-large lection scheme or a reapportionment plan, whether the governing body challenged was local, and fixed-effect controls for judicial circuits and years.