Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Program Plann. 2015 Feb;48:63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.10.004

Table 4.

Results of testing the significance of the indirect effect, that (IV) state-level morale predicts (M) Individual-level Perceptions of the organizational context, when then predict attitudes and practices regarding prevention and evidence-based programming.

Prevention program
implementation		 Commitment to EBP Commitment to Evaluation
Model 3: Significance of Indirect Effect Test
Statistic 		SE p-value Test
Statistic 		SE p-value Test
Statistic 		SE p-value
L1: Openness to change 2.090 0.018 0.037* 2.051 0.016 0.040* 1.126 0.021 0.260
L1: Open. of leadership 3.126 0.025 0.002* 3.200 0.022 0.001* 3.033 0.029 0.002*
L1: Morale −0.009 0.038 0.993 1.209 0.033 0.227 −0.562 0.045 0.574
L1: Communication 3.413 0.024 <0.001* 4.590 0.026 <0.001* 3.108 0.027 0.002*
L1: Resources 0.147 0.012 0.883 −1.113 0.011 0.266 −0.398 0.014 0.691

Note:

*

significant