Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 11;10(2):e0116492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116492

Table 3. Correlations between mentalizing and action regions for the reversed speech control data.

Mentalizing region Action region r p-value
aMPFC Left motor regions -0.150 0.540
Right motor regions -0.070 0.782
Right temporo-parietal junction Left motor regions -0.127 0.614
Right motor regions 0.063 0.805
Precuneus Left motor regions -0.122 0.630
Right motor regions -0.029 0.910

Correlations between Mentalizing regressor activity in mentalizing regions and Action regressor activity in action regions. The r and p-values show that there are no significant correlations as observed in the ‘normal’ (non-reversed) data (reported in Table 2). Original p-values are reported (see Fig. 3 for an illustration). The responses in parts of the cortical motor network were summed over motor regions, as described in the methods section.