Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 11;10(2):e0117166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117166

Table 2. Study characteristics for psychological interventions.

Study ID N Country Mean age yrs (SD) Intervention (mg/day) PT (FU) weeks
APTER1978* 30 NR nr Individual movement therapy vs group movement therapy vs non-specific dance therapy 12 (None)
JACKSON2008 62 AU 22.3 (3.6) Individual CBT + EPPIC TAU vs befriending + EPPIC TAU 14 (52)
JACKSON2009 66 AU 23.3 (4.6) Individual CBT vs TAU 26 (52)
HADDOCK2006* 309 GBR nr Individual CBT+TAU (UK) vs supportive counselling+TAU (UK) vs TAU 18 (78)
MAK2007* 48 CN 24 (4) Individual CBT vs waitlist CBT:36 (60); waitlist:26 (84)
POWER2003 56 AU nr (range 15–29) Individual CBT + EPPIC TAU in acutely suicidal patients vs EPPIC TAU in acutely suicidal patients 10 (26)
GLEESON2009 82 AU 20.1 (3.1) Family CBT + individual CBT vs EPPIC TAU 28 (130)
LINSZEN1996 76 NL 20.6 (2.5) Family CBT vs individual CBT 65 (260)

Note.

* Data not reported in sufficient detail to include in analysis

CBT = cognitive behavioural therapy; EPPIC = Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre; TAU = treatment as usual; UK = United Kingdom; N = number randomised; nr = not reported; na = not applicable; PT = post-treatment data collection; FU = follow-up data collection