Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 11;10(2):e0115822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115822

Table 1. Baseline echocardiographic data of TG and NTG mice.

Parameters NTG, 2 month TG, 2 month NTG, 6 month TG, 6 month
DSEPWT, mm 0.82±0.05 0.93±0.03 0.92±0.07 1.1±0.07
LVEDD, mm 3.76±0.15 3.76±0.05 3.54±0.1 3.52±0.24
DPWT, mm 0.69±0.02 0.79±0.04 0.95±0.1 1.15±0.08
SSEPWT, mm 1.11±0.03 1.3±0.08 1.27±0.11 1.58±0.07
LVESD, mm 2.41±0.11 2.48±0.05 2.48±0.09 2.19±0.16
SPWWT, mm 0.9±0.04 1.05±0.03* 1.26±0.11 1.48±0.11*
EF, % 74±1 71±1 66±2 76±1**
FS, % 36±1 34±1 30±1 38±1**
HR, bpm 417±17 359±17 # 444±24 415±59
LA Diameter, mm 2.2 ± 0.05 2.8 ± 0.33 1.9 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.4**
E velocity, cm/s 68±2 69±8 58±8 68±2
A Velocity, cm/s 54±3 30±8** 44±6 18±3**
E/A ratio 1.3±0.1 2.8±1.0 1.4±0.1 4.4±0.6**

DSEPWT-diastolic septal wall thickness; LVEDD- left ventricular end diastolic dimension; DPWT- diastolic posterior wall thickness; SSEPWT- systolic septal wall thickness; LVESD-Left ventricular end systolic dimension; SPWWT-systolic posterior wall thickness; EF-ejection fraction; FS-fractional shortening; HR- heart rate; bpm- beats per minute; LA Diameter- left atrial diameter; E velocity- early filling velocity; A velocity- atrial filling velocity. Data are mean ± SEM.

**significantly different from NTG, p<0.005

*significantly different from NTG, p<0.05

n = 5 for 2 month old groups and n = 6 for 6 month old groups

# NTG vs.TG

p = 0.056