Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 18;52(2):928–935. doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1059-y

Table 3.

Scavenging effects on DPPH and inhibiting effects on pancreatic α-amylase activityof purification products from the ethyl acetate fraction

Subfractions Scavenging effect Inhibiting effect
EC50(μg/mL) Regression equation R2 IC50(mg/mL) Regression equation R2
QEF1 360.3 ± 0.12 y = 1.1760x + 7.3522 0.9956 >16
QEF2 270.1 ± 10.53 y = 7.0445x–0.1542 0.9984 10.9 ± 0.40 y = 5.1760x–6.3324 0.9974
QEF3 235.2 ± 9.64 y = 0.1610x + 12.1430 0.9587 9.4 ± 0.31 y = 6.2048x–8.0609 0.9594
QEF4 109.7 ±8.73 y = 0.4350x + 6.6394 0.9762 8.2 ± 0.25 y = 6.3727x–2.2339 0.9509
QEF5 105.4 ± 0.97 y = 0.4274x + 4.9564 0.9926 7.9 ± 0.23 y = 4.9771x + 10.5100 0.9932
QEF6 81.9 ± 1.75 y = 0.5252x + 7.7326 0.9820 2.4 ± 0.10 y = 14.2170x + 16.3680 0.9144
QEF7 77.9 ± 1.32 y = 0.5195x + 9.5402 0.9918 1.6 ± 0.04 y = 16.6360x + 24.1290 0.9164
QEF8 4.6 ± 0.43 y = 10.1880x + 3.6992 0.9821 0.4 ± 0.01 y = 163.6900x–10.1260 0.9717

n = 3, Mean ± SD

QEF1-QEF8, the first to eighth subfraction of the ethyl acetate fraction through Sephadex LH-20 column