Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 2;56(2):138–143. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.138

Table 1.

Comparison of the patients in groups 1 and 2

graphic file with name kju-56-138-i001.jpg

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

Group 1, renal pelvic stone (RPS) were totally fragmented with rigid ureteroscopy (URS); group 2, flexible URS was required to fragment the RPS; ESWL, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.