Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 10;81(5):1874–1883. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03640-14

TABLE 4.

Optimization of electrotransformation for B. smithii ET 138

Parameter change Final ODa Period of growth (h)b Electroporation setting
Cuvette size (mm) Amt (μg) of DNA Recovery mediumc CFUd
Voltage (kV) μF Ω
Settingse 0.483 1.75 1.5 25 600 1 1 RG2 3
Settingsf 0.483 1.75 2.0 25 200 2 1 RG2 33
Settings 0.424 2.9 2.0 25 400 2 0.7 RG2 157
Recovery medium 0.519 1.75 2.0 25 400 2 1 LB2 960
Recovery medium 0.519 1.75 2.0 25 400 2 1 RG2 5
Fast growthg 0.539 1 2.0 25 400 2 2.5 LB2 1,900
μg DNA addedg 0.617 1.3 2.0 25 400 2 0.2 LB2 2,409
μg DNA addedg 0.617 1.3 2.0 25 400 2 0.02 LB2 5,118
a

Final OD600 after the indicated number of hours when growing cells prior to making them competent.

b

Number of hours cells had grown before making them competent.

c

RG2 is LB2 with 121 g/liter sucrose and 10 g/liter glucose (29).

d

CFU indicate CFU per μg DNA. Using fresh cells or cells stored at −80°C did not change CFU counts.

e

Settings from reference 29.

f

Settings are based on reference 30, the same settings as those used for screening of Geobacillus strains.

g

In these experiments, after overnight growth, cells were transferred into 500-ml Erlenmeyer flasks or 1-liter bottles (having a similar bottom surface) instead of into a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask to allow for more aeration.