Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 16;7(2):102–109. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.102

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of propofol vs traditional sedation in endoscopy

Ref. Procedures Sedation compared No. of studies (cases) OR (95%CI) for adverse events
Qadeer et al[23], 2005 EGD/colonoscopy/ERCP/EUS Propofol vs traditional sedation 12 (1161) 0.74 (0.44-1.24)
Singh et al[2], 2008 Colonoscopy Propofol vs traditional sedation 22 Hypoxia: 0.69 (0.25-1.89); Hypotension: 1.03 (0.28-3.83)
Bo et al[21], 2011 ERCP Propofol vs traditional sedation 6 (663) 1.69 (0.82-3.50)
Garewal et al[24], 2012 ERCP Propofol vs traditional sedation 4 (510) Narrative
Wang et al[1], 2013 EGD/colonoscopy/ERCP Propofol vs traditional sedation 22 (1798) 0.90 (0.70-1.17)

EGD: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.