Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 16;7(2):135–153. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.135

Table 2.

Pooled analysis of 232 patients with refractory benign esophageal strictures according to Kochman’s criteria treated with self-expandable stent placement n (%)

Stricture etiology
Anastomotic strictures 69 (29.7)
Peptic strictures 58 (25.0)
Radiation strictures 36 (15.5)
Caustic strictures 29 (12.5)
Others 26 (11.2)
Unknown 14 (6.0)
Stent type
FC SEMS 85 (36.6)
BD stent 77 (33.2)
SEPS 70 (30.2)
PC SEMS 0 (0)
Technical success
Overall 229 (98.7)
FC SEMS 85 (100)
BD stent 77 (100)
SEPS 67 (95.7)
Clinical success
Overall (n = 231) 56 (24.2)
FC SEMS (n = 85) 12 (14.1)
BD stent (n = 76) 25 (32.9)
SEPS (n = 70) 19 (27.1)

FC SEMS: Fully covered self-expandable metal stent; BD stent: Biodegradable stent; SEPS: Self-expandable plastic stent; PC SEMS: Partially covered self-expandable metal stent.