Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 12;5:8487. doi: 10.1038/srep08487

Table 2. Previous use of LNG-EC.

  EP IUP NonP OR1 [95%CI] OR2 [95%CI] AOR1 [95%CI]b AOR2 [95%CI]b
  n a (%) n a (%) n a (%) EP vs. NonP EP vs. IUP EP vs. NonP EP vs. IUP
Previous use of LNG-EC                    
Not used 1,283 (53.57) 1,311 (54.74) 1,330 (55.12) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Yes 1,112 (46.43) 1,084 (45.26) 1,083 (44.88) 0.94 [0.84, 1.05] 0.95 [0.85, 1.07] 0.99 [0.85, 1.18] 0.95 [0.82, 1.10]
Total times of LNG-EC use                    
Not used 1,283 (53.57) 1,311 (54.74) 1,330 (55.12) Reference Reference Reference Reference
1–2 585 (24.43) 568 (23.72) 566 (23.46) 1.07 [0.93, 1.23] 1.05 [0.92, 1.21] 1.08 [0.89, 1.31] 1.17 [0.99, 1.38]
3–4 290 (12.11) 305 (12.73) 334 (13.84) 0.90 [0.75, 1.07] 0.97 [0.81, 1.16] 0.89 [0.69, 1.13] 0.93 [0.74, 1.17]
≥5 237 (9.89) 211 (8.81) 183 (7.58) 1.34 [1.09, 1.65] 1.15 [0.94, 1.40] 0.94 [0.70, 1.26] 0.85 [0.66, 1.11]
P for trend             0.15 0.35 0.71 0.67
Times of LNG-EC use in the past one year                    
Not used 1,283 (53.57) 1,311 (54.74) 1,330 (55.12) Reference Reference Reference Reference
0 542 (22.63) 566 (23.63) 659 (27.31) 0.85 [0.74, 0.98] 0.98 [0.85, 1.13] 0.94 [0.78, 1.13] 1.15 [0.97, 1.36]
1–2 349 (14.57) 355 (14.82) 294 (12.18) 1.23 [1.04, 1.46] 0.96 [0.82, 1.14] 1.08 [0.84, 1.39] 0.89 [0.71, 1.10]
3–4 125 (5.22) 99 (4.13) 74 (3.07) 1.75 [1.30, 2.36] 1.52 [1.14, 2.03] 1.16 [0.78, 1.72] 1.05 [0.74, 1.50]
≥5 96 (4.01) 64 (2.67) 56 (2.32) 1.78 [1.27, 2.49] 1.53 [1.11, 2.12] 1.31 [0.83, 2.06] 0.92 [0.61, 1.39]
P for trend             <10−4 0.01 0.47 0.75
Last use-current cycle interval (months)                    
Not used 1,283 (53.57) 1,311 (54.74) 1,330 (55.12) Reference Reference Reference Reference
>12 542 (22.63) 566 (23.63) 659 (27.31) 0.85 [0.74, 0.98] 0.98 [0.85, 1.13] 0.94 [0.78, 1.13] 1.15 [0.97, 1.36]
7–12 231 (9.65) 246 (10.27) 199 (8.24) 1.20 [0.98, 1.48] 0.96 [0.79, 1.17] 1.13 [0.85, 1.50] 0.88 [0.68, 1.13]
4–6 189 (7.89) 173 (7.22) 150 (6.22) 1.31 [1.04, 1.64] 1.12 [0.90, 1.39] 1.04 [0.75, 1.44] 0.85 [0.64, 1.13]
1–3 150 (6.26) 99 (4.13) 75 (3.11) 2.07 [1.56, 2.76] 1.55 [1.19, 2.02] 1.26 [0.86, 1.85] 1.13 [0.81, 1.57]
P for trend             <10−4 0.01 0.37 0.86

EP, ectopic pregnancy; IUP, intrauterine pregnancy; NonP, non-pregnancy; LNG-EC, levonorgestrel emergency contraception; OR, odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

aThe sum does not necessarily equal the sample size for all variables because of missing data.

bInstitutions was used as a random effect in the mixed effects model to adjusted ORs for birth place, education attainment, occupation, parity, previous ectopic pregnancy, presence of serum Chlamydia trachomatis IgG, previous infertility, previous adnexal surgery, previous appendectomy, previous contraceptive methods (IUDs and other contraceptive methods), and current contraceptive methods (no, IUDs, OCPs, sterilization, LNG-EC, and other contraceptive methods).