Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 20;8:23–33. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S39085

Table 1.

Key completed studies evaluating carfilzomib in MM

Study Population Patients ORR (%) CR + VGPR PFS (months) OS (months)
PX-171-001 (Phase I) carfilzomib (single agent)13 Hematologic malignancies (MM, NHL, WM, HL) 29 NR NR NR NR
PX-171-002 (Phase I) carfilzomib (single agent)12 Hematologic malignancies (MM, NHL, HL) 48 NR NR NR NR
PX-171-003-A0 (Phase IIB) carfilzomib (single agent)35 RRMM 46 16.7 0 (0 + 0) 3.5 NR
PX-171-003-A1 (Phase II) carfilzomib (single agent)15 RRMM 266 23.7 5.5% (0.4% + 5.1%) 3.7 15.6
PX-171-004 (Phase II) carfilzomib (single agent, 20 mg/m2 versus 27 mg/m2)17 RRMM 129 42.4 versus 52.2 17% (3.4% + 13.6%) versus 28.4% (1.5% + 26.9%) 8.2 versus NR NR
PX-171-005 (Phase II) carfilzomib (single agent)33 RRMM: renal dysfunction 50 25.5 0 (0 + 0) NR NR
PX-171-006 (Phase IB) carfilzomib + Rd22 Relapsed or progressive MM 40 62.5 35% (2.5% + 32.5%) 10.2 NR
PX-171-006 (Phase II) carfilzomib + Rd21 Relapsed or progressive MM 52 76.9 42.2% (5.7% + 36.5%) 28.7 37
PX-171-007 (Phase IB/II) carfilzomib (single agent) dose-expansion cohort16 Relapsed MM, solid tumors or lymphoma 33 55 28% (5% + 23%) 7 NR
Carfilzomib + Rd (Phase I/II)26 Newly diagnosed 53 98 81% (62% + 19%) NR NR
Carfilzomib + clarithromycin + Rd (Phase I)27 Newly diagnosed 24 87 61% (13% + 48%) NR NR
FOCUS: PX-171-011 (Phase III) carfilzomib versus best supportive care18 RRMM 315 NR NR NR NR
ASPIRE: PX-171-009 (Phase III) carfilzomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone versus lenalidomide + dexamethasone Planned interim analysis25 Relapsed MM 792 NR NR 26.3 versus 17.6 NR

Abbreviations: ORR, overall response rate; CR, complete response; VGPR, very good partial response; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; RRMM, relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma; NHL, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; WM, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia; Rd, Revlimid and dexamethasone; NR, not reported.