Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 24;89(5):2831–2841. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03355-14

TABLE 1.

Macroscopic and microscopic lung lesion scores of infected and contact pigs

Lesion size Virus Lung lesion scorea
Infected pigs
Contact pigs (5 days p.c.)
3 days p.i. 5 days p.i. 7 days p.i.
Macroscopic KS-83533N 13.71 ± 4.95 6.00 ± 1.55 4.71 ± 1.13 3.00 ± 0.61
KS-91088 10.68 ± 2.75 4.54 ± 1.97 2.43 ± 0.72 4.18 ± 0.87
KS-110529 11.71 ± 0.61 9.71 ± 0.87 5.86 ± 0.35 7.68 ± 2.73
KS-107824 15.93 ± 7.66 5.89 ± 1.19 4.11 ± 1.15 1.32 ± 1.96
Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA
Microscopic KS-83533N 2.50 ± 0.20 2.38 ± 0.24 1.75 ± 0.14 1.50 ± 0.20b
KS-91088 1.88 ± 0.13 1.88 ± 0.31 1.75 ± 0.32 1.38 ± 0.24c
KS-110529 2.25 ± 0.25 2.27 ± 0.24 2.50 ± 0.20 2.38 ± 0.24d
KS-107824 1.75 ± 0.48 2.13 ± 0.38 1.50 ± 0.20 0.75 ± 0.14b,c,d
Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA
a

The macroscopic lung lesion scores were determined as percentages of the lung. The microscopic lung lesion scores were determined by the following criteria: 0, no lesion; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3; severe. The data are means ± standard errors of the mean (SEM). NA, not applicable; there were no control pigs in the contact group.

b

Significant differences were observed between the 2 groups (P < 0.05).

c

Significant differences were observed between the 2 groups (P < 0.05).

d

Significant differences were observed between the 2 groups (P < 0.001).