TABLE 4.

Evaluation of the predictive performance of the studied models relative to the Muro et al. (14) model

Model	Bias and precision relative to Muro model
	ΔMPE		ΔMSPE
	Mean	95% CI	Mean	95% CI
Crandon et al. (9)	1.84	0.77 to 2.92	−28.76	−53.9 to −3.58
Li et al. (7)	4.27	3.57 to 4.98	−26.01	−50.36 to −1.67
Doh et al. with edema (8)	2.98	2.25 to 3.71	−20.03	−39.37 to −0.69
Doh et al. without edema (8)	4.33	3.57 to 5.09	−35.24	−58.05 to −12.42
Leroy et al. (11, 13)	5.37	4.72 to 6.02	−41.91	−69.79 to −14.03
Christensson et al. (12)	4.47	3.85 to 5.09	−39.02	−68.3 to −9.73
Roberts et al. (10)	3.39	1.45 to 5.33	−149.75	−206.44 to −93.06