Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 6;15:41. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1057-8

Table 4.

Sensitivity analyses estimating hazard ratios for non-melanoma skin cancer associated with rosiglitazone exposure

Rosiglitazone use Setting entry date to 1 January 2005 Deleting patients who developed skin cancer within 3 months of follow-up Excluding patients with a history of any cancer before 2006 Including pioglitazone users in the analyses Time-dependent models
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Ever users 0.986 (0.882, 1.102) 0.7977 0.933 (0.809, 1.075) 0.3368 0.951 (0.834, 1.083) 0.4469 0.938 (0.835, 1.055) 0.2863 0.909 (0.785, 1.051) 0.1981
Duration of therapy (months)
 <3.73 1.177 (0.975, 1.421) 0.0903 1.119 (0.900, 1.392) 0.3106 1.055 (0.855, 1.302) 0.6199 1.114 (0.930, 1.336) 0.2411 1.287 (1.050, 1.579) 0.0153
 3.73-13.77 1.112 (0.939, 1.318) 0.2189 0.989 (0.792, 1.234) 0.9194 1.096 (0.906, 1.325) 0.3452 1.025 (0.862, 1.219) 0.7781 1.059 (0.851, 1.317) 0.6099
 >13.77 0.787 (0.662, 0.935) 0.0065 0.713 (0.554, 0.918) 0.0087 0.737 (0.592, 0.916) 0.0060 0.718 (0.589, 0.874) 0.0010 0.583 (0.457, 0.740) <0.0001
 P-trend 0.1215 0.0484 0.0871 0.0186 0.0024
Cumulative dose (mg)
 <448 1.138 (0.939, 1.379) 0.1883 1.092 (0.876, 1.361) 0.4336 0.985 (0.793, 1.223) 0.8882 1.059 (0.880, 1.275) 0.5418 1.286 (1.030, 1.607) 0.0264
 448-1752 1.099 (0.929, 1.301) 0.2722 0.923 (0.735, 1.159) 0.4892 1.105 (0.915, 1.334) 0.3015 1.011 (0.849, 1.203) 0.9047 0.983 (0.775, 1.247) 0.8876
 >1752 0.815 (0.687, 0.966) 0.0186 0.798 (0.627, 1.016) 0.0672 0.780 (0.630, 0.965) 0.0224 0.773 (0.638, 0.936) 0.0084 0.614 (0.476, 0.792) 0.0002
P-trend 0.1839 0.0971 0.1685 0.0482 0.0041

Referent group: never-users of rosiglitazone; HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence intervals.

In models excluding patients not treated with rosiglitazone and using the first tertile of exposure as referent, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for the second and third tertile of duration of therapy was 0.850 (0.634, 1.140) (P = 0.2777) and 0.639 (0.465, 0.876) (P = 0.0054), respectively (P-trend = 0.0054); and was 0.852 (0.633, 1.148) and 0.712 (0.521, 0.973), respectively, for cumulative dose (P-trend = 0.0327).