Table 4.
Activities led by school health centers | Feasible (mean) | Would increase uptake (mean) |
---|---|---|
|
||
Obtain consent for vaccination from parents while they are at school† | 1.7 | 2.3 b |
Mail parents letters endorsing adolescent vaccines† | 2.4 a | 2.0 |
Send reminders to parents when students are due for adolescent vaccines† | -- | 2.4 b |
Have student-led promotional campaigns | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Host school-based HPV vaccine awareness raising events | 2.0 | 2.2 |
Give student incentives for receiving adolescent vaccines | 2.8 a | 2.5 b |
Activities led by outside parties | Helpful (mean) | Would increase uptake (mean) |
|
||
Provide additional training to use NCIR | 2.1 | 1.9 |
Pay for privately-purchased doses of HPV vaccine after administration | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Add school health centers to private insurance plans’ approved providers | 2.2 | 2.1 |
Develop new consent forms that appeal to parents | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Give additional HPV vaccine brochures or posters | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Address HPV vaccine in health education classes | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Note. Response scales had 3 options (ie, “not at all doable” to “very doable”; “would increase uptake not at all” to “would increase uptake a lot”; or “would help not at all” to “would help a lot”).
Does not include clinics already engaging in these activities.
These two activities had higher ratings for “Feasibility” that the remaining 3 school-led activities, based on post-hoc t-tests.
These three activities had higher ratings for “Would increase uptake” than the remaining 3 school-led activities, based on post-hoc t-tests.