Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Soc Behav. 2014 Dec;55(4):403–423. doi: 10.1177/0022146514556893

Table 6.

Regression Coefficients for Negative Marital Quality Predicting Cardiovascular Risks from Logistic Regression Models for Men

Hypertension W2
(N=738)
Rapid heart rate W2
(N=700)
High CRP W2
(N=631)
CVD events W2
(N=736)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Controlled
vs. normal
Undiagnosed
vs. normal
Uncontrolled
vs. normal
Controlled
vs. normal
Undiagnosed
vs. normal
Uncontrolled
vs. normal
Age W1 (ref=57–64)
 65–74 0.45 (0.46) 0.77 (0.41) 0.15 (0.37) 0.43 (0.45) 0.74 (0.41) 0.10 (0.37) −0.13b (0.34) −0.13 (0.34) −0.51 (0.27) −0.57* (0.26) 0.82* (0.33) 0.83* (0.33)
 75–85 −0.88 (0.60) 0.19 (0.68) −1.14*b (0.53) −0.98 (0.60) 0.09a (0.71) −1.23*a (0.55) 0.44 (0.49) 0.22b (0.55) 0.03 (0.42) 0.04 (0.41) 1.15 (0.62) 1.27* (0.60)
NMQ W1 −0.16 (0.19) 0.03 (0.20) −0.18b (0.21) −0.36 (0.29) 0.17 (0.30) −0.24 (0.34) 0.01 (0.15) −0.03 (0.19) 0.33*a (0.13) 0.22 (0.15) −0.02 (0.21) 0.04 (0.32)
NMQ W1 X age 65–74 0.24 (0.51) −0.35 (0.46) 0.02 (0.53) −0.15a (0.43) 0.38 (0.30) 0.05 (0.38)
NMQ W1 X age 75–85 0.61b (0.75) −0.31a (0.61) 0.28b (0.74) 0.62 (0.51) −0.03 (0.36) −0.45a (0.52)
Change of NMQ W2-W1 −0.57*a (0.25) −0.33a (0.20) −0.16a (0.21) −1.07**a (0.31) −0.26 (0.27) −0.49a (0.25)
Change of NMQ W2-W1 X age 65–74 1.30*a (0.51) 0.16 (0.49) 0.99* (0.45)
Change of NMQ W2-W1 X age 75–85 0.66 (0.68) −0.44 (0.68) 0.45 (0.71)
Constant −0.46 (1.11) 2.92 (1.47) 1.86* (0.92) −0.59 (1.07) 2.96* (1.45) 1.76 (0.91) −2.20 (1.40) −2.26 (1.38) −1.35 (0.97) −1.33 (0.96) −2.23 (1.51) −2.27 (1.52)
***

p<0.001,

**

p<0.01,

*

p<0.05.

a

Wald tests: difference between men and women is significant at p<0.05.

b

Wald tests: difference between men and women is significant at p<0.1.

Standard errors in parentheses.

NMQ: negative marital quality. W1: Wave 1. W2: Wave 2.

In all models, we control for race-ethnicity, education, relative family income, smoking, drinking, BMI physical activity, antihypertensive medication use, and psychological distress (all measured at Wave 1) as well probability of death at W2 and probability of remaining married in both waves. Wave 1 measures of hypertension, rapid heart rate, high CRP and CVD events are also controlled in all models.

Our preliminary analyses suggested that the effects of change of negative marital quality between W1–W2 were not statistically significant (p > 0.05) when predicting rapid heart rate, high CRP and CVD events for men, and are thus not included in the final models.