Abstract
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a major constituent of the vessel wall. In addition to providing a structural scaffold, the ECM controls numerous cellular functions in both physiologic and pathologic settings. Vascular remodeling occurs after injury and is characterized by endothelial cell activation, inflammatory cell infiltration, phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs), and augmented deposition of collagen-rich ECM. R1R2, a peptide derived from the bacterial adhesin SFS, with sequence homology to collagen, is known to inhibit collagen type I deposition in vitro by inhibiting the binding of fibronectin to collagen. However, the inhibitory effects of R1R2 during vascular remodeling have not been explored. We periadventitially delivered R1R2 to carotid arteries using pluronic gel in a vascular remodeling mouse model induced by blood flow cessation, and evaluated its effects on intima-media thickening, ECM deposition, SMC activation, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Morphometric analysis demonstrated that R1R2 reduced intima-media thickening compared to the control groups. R1R2 treatment also decreased collagen type I deposition in the vessel wall, and maintained SMC in the contractile phenotype. Interestingly, R1R2 dramatically reduced inflammatory cell infiltration into the vessel by ∼78%. This decrease was accompanied by decreased VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression. Our in vitro studies revealed that R1R2 attenuated SMC proliferation and migration, and also decreased monocyte adhesion and transendothelial migration through endothelial cells. Together, these data suggest that R1R2 attenuates vascular remodeling responses by decreasing inflammation and by modulating SMC proliferation and migration, and suggest that the R1R2 peptide may have therapeutic potential in treating occlusive vascular diseases.
Introduction
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a major component of tissues. In addition to providing structural support for tissues, the ECM is also an important regulator of cell proliferation, migration and differentiation. The composition and organization of ECM proteins is dynamically remodeled by cell-mediated regulation of ECM synthesis, deposition, degradation, and the interplay between ECM proteins. Tight regulation of ECM remodeling is essential for maintaining normal physiological processes, such as development and wound healing [1–4]. In contrast, dysregulation of ECM remodeling can disrupt tissue homeostasis and result in pathological conditions. In addition to inflammatory cell infiltration and smooth muscle cell activation, ECM remodeling is one of the hallmarks of pathologic vascular remodeling [4–8]. Changes in the ECM can have profound impacts on vascular architecture and cellular behavior [9–12]. Collagen type I is the most abundant ECM protein in the vessel wall, and augmented collagen type I accumulation is observed in vessels following injury [7,13,14]. In vivo studies demonstrate that excess collagen type I deposition in the vessel wall changes the collagen/elastin ratio and alters the mechanics of the blood vessels, resulting in increased arterial stiffness [15–17]. Furthermore, by binding to cell surface receptors such as integrins or discoidin domain receptors (DDRs), collagen type I acts as a signaling molecule which affects vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell growth and migration [18–22]. Therefore, methods that manipulate ECM remodeling and efficiently decrease collagen type I deposition in the vessel wall have the therapeutic potential to interrupt the progression of occlusive vascular diseases.
The close relationship between fibronectin (FN) and collagen has long been described. FN can bind directly to collagen type I with a well-characterized collagen-binding domain [23–25]. Extensive co-distribution of FN with collagen type I is observed in tissues as well as in cultured cells [26,27]. In vitro studies have shown that deposition of collagen type I fibrils is dependent on the presence of FN matrix [28–31]. Inhibiting FN-collagen binding impairs collagen fibril formation around cells and decreases SMC migration [29]. In addition, previous studies have revealed that repression of collagen expression attenuates neointimal formation in an animal model [32]. In this study, we used the peptide, R1R2, which is known to inhibit collagen type I deposition by blocking FN-collagen binding [33], to address the role that collagen type I deposition plays during vascular remodeling. The R1R2 peptide is derived from a FN binding bacterial adhesion, and contains a sequence similar to sequences in types I-IV collagen [33]. We delivered R1R2 periadventitially using pluronic gel in a flow-induced vascular remodeling model in mice [34,35] and assessed its effects on the extent of neointimal formation, SMC activation, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Our results show that R1R2 attenuates vascular remodeling by decreasing early inflammatory cell invasion and SMC phenotypic modulation.
Materials and Methods
Materials
The R1R2 and scrambled peptides were custom synthesized by Kelowna International Scientific Inc. (Taipei, Taiwan). The sequence of R1R2 used in this study is: GLNGENQKEPEQGERGEAGPPLSGLSGNNQGRPSLPGLNGENQKEPEQGERGEAGPP. The scrambled peptide is: PGPGAEQPEQSKERNSQERGNGLALPGEELEGQEGGNKPSGENNGPPQGNLRGPLEG. Human FN and rat collagen type I for competitive ELISA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). TNF-α for in vitro assays was from Roche (Basel, Switzerland).
Cell Culture
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and A7r5 SMCs were provided by Resource Center (SB3, NSC 100-2325-B-080-001), National Research Program for Biopharmaceuticals (Hsinchu, Taiwan). HUVECs were maintained in M199 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) with 25U/ml heparin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS; Millipore, Billerica, MA). A7r5 SMCs were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) containing high glucose, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Human U937 cells were grown in RPMI1640 with 10% FBS.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbant Assay (ELISA)
96-well plates were coated with 10 μg/ml collagen I or BSA at 4°C overnight. In separate plates, FN (4 nM) was incubated with the indicated amount of R1R2 or scrambled peptide at 4°C overnight. The FN-peptide solutions were added to collagen or BSA-coated wells, and the plates were incubated overnight at 37°C. The wells were washed and a rabbit anti-FN antibody was added for 90 minutes at room temperature. Wells were washed and then incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. After washing was completed, peroxidase activity was quantified using 2,2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid). Measurements were done at 405 nm (A405) using a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Device, Sunnyvale, CA).
Ethics Statement
All animals and procedures in this study were approved by the Chang Gung University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Approval No: CGU 10-025).
Complete Common Carotid Ligation
6–8 week-old FVB/NJ (FVB) mice were subjected to complete common carotid ligation on the left side [34–36]. FVB mice are known to be very responsive to flow-induced vascular remodeling [37,38]. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane inhalation. The left common carotid artery was exposed, dissected free from the surrounding connective tissue and completely ligated with 6-0 silk suture just proximal to the carotid bifurcation. In some animals, 50 μl of F-127 pluronic gel (BASF) with or without peptide was applied to the carotid artery periadventitially immediately after the ligation. 5 groups were used in this study: (1) sham-operated, in which the left carotid artery was exposed and dissected out, but not ligated (2) ligation (3) ligation with pluronic gel (4) ligation with pluronic gel containing 20 μM scrambled peptide (5) ligation with pluronic gel containing 20μM R1R2. 4–10 mice were included in each experimental group.
Tissue Collection and Morphometric Analysis
5 groups of animals were processed for morphometric analysis. Mice were fixed with 10% formalin 7 or 14 days after the surgery. The common carotid arteries were harvested and embedded in paraffin. For each animal, cross-sections with 5μm thickness within the first mm proximal to the ligature were stained with Verhoeff-van Gieson elastic stain then the lumenal, intimal+medial area, and the area included within the external elastic lamina (EEL) were analyzed with Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, MD) as described [35,36].
Immunocytochemistry and Quantitative Analysis
Paraffin sections selected from the first mm of the carotid artery in each group were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC). The primary antibodies used were: polyclonal anti-collagen I (Millipore, Billerica, MA), polyclonal anti-FN (Millipore, Billerica, MA), polyclonal anti-smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-MHC) (Biomedical Technologies, Stoughton, MA), monoclonal anti α-smooth muscle actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), polyclonal anti-Ki-67 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-leukocyte common antigen, CD45 (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA), monoclonal anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) and polyclonal anti-vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas). Sections were then incubated with appropriate biotinylated secondary antibodies followed by avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase system (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Liquid DAB Substrate Chromogen system (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) was used for detection.
Quantitative IHC analysis was performed on digital images captured with a 20x objective by using Image-Pro Plus software. Data from 3–6 mice for each group were averaged, and the average values ± SEM were shown. For FN, collagen type I, SM-MHC and SM α-actin, color digital images were transformed into gray scale, and the sum of the optical densities from the intima+media area in each section was determined. For evaluation of proliferating cells, the percent of Ki-67 (+) cells to total cells was determined by counting cell numbers in the immunostained sections that had been counterstained with hematoxylin. The percent of positive cells is reported as the proliferation index. For quantitative evaluation of leukocyte infiltration and cell adhesion molecule expression, the positive staining area for CD 45, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 were obtained using an automated programmed segmentation procedure in Image-Pro Plus software. The intima+media region was traced manually. The percent of positively stained area in intima+media to the total traced area was assessed.
Western Blot Analysis
Tissues or cells were homogenized with RIPA buffer [39] supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Cell lysates were spun at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C, then electrophoresed on 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were incubated with antibody to collagen type I (1:1000; Millipore, Billerica, MA), FN (1:8000; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), ICAM-1 (1:500; GeneTex, Irvine, CA), VCAM-1 (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas), or GAPDH (1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) overnight, followed by horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibodies (1:12000; BioRad, Hercules, CA) for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL).
Hydroxyproline Assay
In each independent experiment, three common carotid arteries 14 days after ligation per group were pooled, homogenized, precipitated with trichloroacetic acid, and baked overnight at 110°C in 37% hydrochloric acid. After reconstituting with water, samples were measured using a colorimetric chloramine T assay [40]. Three independent experiments were performed for statistical analysis.
SMC Migration Assay
A scrape wound assay was used to assess the effect of R1R2 and scrambled peptides on SMC migration as described [36]. Briefly, A7r5 SMCs were grown until 90% confluent, followed by serum starvation and treatment with R1R2 and scrambled peptides for 36 hours. Several scrape wounds were then performed across the dish with a sterile yellow pipet tip. We initiated the experiment with treatment of cells with 10 ng/ml PDGF-BB. Photographs of the wound area were taken immediately after PDGF-BB addition (0 hour) and 30 hours postwounding with an Olympus CKX-41 microscope connected to a camera. At least three photographs were taken per group at each time point. Wound areas were determined using Image-Pro Software (Media Cybernetics, MD). Measurement of migration was determined by subtracting the cell-free area 30 hours after PDGF-BB addition from the cell-free area in the beginning of scrape wounds.
Cell Proliferation Assay
A7r5 cells and HUVECs were growth-arrested and then stimulated with 10% FBS or 10 ng/ml TNF-αovernight after serum starvation as indicated in the figure legend. Briefly, trypan blue-excluding cells were counted with a hemocytometer, and data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism Software (San Diego, CA) as in previous studies [36]. A second observer performed a similar analysis to verify the initial findings.
Monocyte Adhesion to HUVECs
HUVECs were cultured on gelatin-coated 24-well plates and pre-treated with 10 ng/ml TNF-α (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) for 6 hours after serum starvation. Monocyte U937 cells were stained with calcein-AM and added onto HUVECs at a concentration of 5x105 cells/well for 30 minutes at 37°C. The media were gently removed, and the cells were washed three times with PBS. The number of U937 that were adherent to HUVEC was quantitated by the fluorescence of calcein-AM using a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Device, Sunnyvale, CA) set at 485 (excitation)/535 (emission). The number of cells per cm2 was calculated in comparison with the fluorescent intensity derived from known cell numbers of labeled U937 cells.
Monocyte Transendothelial Migration Assay
HUVECs were grown on gelatin-coated 5um pore-sized transwells in 24-well plates (Corning, Corning, NY) and pre-treated with 10 ng/ml TNF-α (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) overnight after serum starvation. Briefly, calcein-AM stained U937 cells were added onto HUVECs at a concentration of 1.5x105 cells/transwell for 1.5 hours at 37°C. After aspirating the media from the top well and washing with PBS three times, the transwells were transferred into new 24-well plates containing 800 ul cell dissociation buffer and cells were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C in a CO2 incubator to detach the transmigrated cells into the buffer. Transmigrated U937 were quantitated by the fluorescence intensity of calcein-AM using a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Device, Sunnyvale, CA) set at 485 (excitation)/535 (emission). The number of cells per well was calculated in comparison to fluorescent intensity derived from known cell numbers of labeled U937 cells.
Statistics
For in vivo experiments, the data are shown as the mean ± SEM. For in vitro experiments, the data shown are the means ± SD of a representative experiment, at least 3 independent experiments were performed. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc testing were used for data analysis with GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). If normality test failed, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test were used. P > 0.05 was not considered significant.
Results
Collagen Inhibitory Peptide R1R2 Blocks the Binding of Collagen to FN
In order to assess whether inhibiting collagen type I deposition reduces vascular remodeling in an in vivo mouse model, we used the collagen inhibitory peptide R1R2 for this study. The R1R2 peptide is derived from two repeat domains of the bacterial adhesin SFS, and is highly homologous to collagen. R1R2 is known to inhibit collagen-FN binding, collagen type I deposition, and smooth muscle cell migration in vitro [29,30,33]. It is likely that R1R2 blocks collagen type I fibril formation around cells by binding to the collagen-binding domain of FN. To characterize the effects of our synthesized R1R2, and a newly generated scrambled peptide, we performed a solid-phase binding assay to determine the effect of R1R2 on FN binding to collagen. As shown in Fig. 1, R1R2 blocked the binding of FN to collagen type I in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the scrambled peptide had no effect on FN-collagen binding. Therefore, we used our synthesized R1R2 and scrambled peptides for further experiments in this study.
R1R2 Attenuates Neointimal Hyperplasia
To directly test the effect of the R1R2 peptide in a model of vascular remodeling in mice, we evaluated the extent of neointimal formation in the presence or absence of the R1R2 peptide 7 days and 14 days after completely ligating the left common carotid artery in FVB mice. In this flow-induced model of vascular remodeling, neointimal formation is accompanied by significant leukocyte infiltration, proliferation of VSMCs, and extensive ECM accumulation; the endothelium remains intact [34–36]. R1R2 was periadventitially applied into carotid arteries using pluronic gel. We previously showed that a recombinant peptide can be delivered periadventitially by pluronic gel into the intima and media layers of mouse carotid artery after surgery [38]. As shown in Fig. 2A, no apparent vascular remodeling was observed in the vessels of sham-operated mice, but the experimental groups of ligation, ligation with gel alone, and ligation with scrambled peptide, revealed significant neointimal formation. There was no difference among these three groups in terms of intima-media area (Intima + Media), area bound by the external elastic lamina (EEL) and intima/media ratio at 7 and 14 days post-ligation (Fig. 2A through 2E and Table 1), indicating the pluronic gel alone and the scrambled peptide have no effect on neointimal formation. Carotid arteries treated with R1R2 peptide, however, showed a dramatic attenuation in injury-induced neointimal formation (Fig. 2A through 2E). Morphometric analyses revealed significantly reduced intima-media areas (Intima + Media), EEL area and intimal/medial ratios 7 days and 14 days after artery ligation in R1R2-treated mice as compared to the control mice (Fig. 2C through 2E and Table 1). Interestingly, there was no significant decrease in the lumenal area in the R1R2-treated vessels at day 7 and 14 after injury when compared to the controls (Fig. 2B). Taken together, our study indicates that R1R2 treatment significantly attenuates neointimal formation in ligated vessels of mice.
Table 1. Morphometric analysis of vascular remodeling in experimental groups.
Lumen (μm2) | Intima+Media (μm2) | EEL Area (μm2) | Intima/Media Ratio | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 day | 14 day | 7 day | 14 day | 7 day | 14 day | 7 day | 14 day | |
Sham | 18298 ± 4314 (n = 6) | 18517 ± 2047 (n = 7) | 20851 ± 1166 (n = 6) | 22044 ± 1397 (n = 7) | 53213 ± 14664 (n = 6) | 41749 ± 2474 (n = 7) | 0 (n = 6) | 0 (n = 7) |
Ligation | 49572 ± 2566 (n = 4) | 32383 ± 7037 (n = 7) | 47420 ± 2489 (n = 4) | 64621 ± 13716 (n = 7) | 96993 ± 4454 (n = 4) | 97004 ± 17488 (n = 7) | 0.1559 ± 0.0250 (n = 4) | 0.5426 ± 0.1848 (n = 7) |
Ligation + Gel | 42024 ± 4161 (n = 9) | 32779 ± 9855 (n = 7) | 42586 ± 2919 (n = 9) | 59264 ± 7374 (n = 7) | 84610 ± 6072 (n = 9) | 99093 ± 14923 (n = 7) | 0.2074 ± 0.0414 (n = 9) | 0.4972 ± 0.1438 (n = 7) |
Ligation + Scrambled Peptide | 44901 ± 4552 (n = 4) | 37551 ± 11976 (n = 4) | 47803 ± 1854 (n = 4) | 65441 ± 11973 (n = 4) | 91403 ± 3805 (n = 4) | 92240 ± 13572 (n = 4) | 0.1807 ± 0.060(n = 4) | 0.4754 ± 0.1143 (n = 4) |
Ligation + R1R2 | 32038 ± 2870 (n = 10) | 25776 ± 4286 (n = 9) | 29208 ± 884 (n = 10) | 25706 ± 1220 (n = 9) | 64905 ± 3680 (n = 10) | 51482 ± 4981 (n = 9) | 0.0424 ± 0.0133 (n = 10) | 0.0709 ± 0.0231 (n = 9) |
R1R2 Decreases Extracellular Matrix Deposition after Vascular Injury
Our data show that R1R2 peptide inhibits the binding of collagen to FN (Fig. 1), which is consistent with published data in vitro [29,30]. To determine the inhibitory effect of R1R2 on ECM accumulation in vessels, we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) and hydroxyproline assay for collagen type I. As aforementioned, no apparent difference in morphometry was observed among the groups of ligation, ligation with gel alone, and ligation with scrambled peptide (Fig. 2). Therefore, we used the experimental group treated with scrambled peptide as the control group. In Fig. 3A and 3B, IHC analysis showed a significant decrease of collagen type I intensity in R1R2-treated arteries compared to the control group on 7 and 14 days after the surgery (7 days: 0.117 ± 0.007, n = 6 vs. 0.198 ± 0.007, n = 6. 14 days: 0.136 ± 0.024, n = 5 vs. 0.151 ± 0.022, n = 6). Hydroxyproline assay (Fig. 3C, 1.522 ± 0.077, n = 3 vs. 2.133 ± 0.284, n = 3) showed a consistent reduction of collagen content in carotid vessels 14 days post-ligation. Previous in vitro studies have revealed that R1R2 inhibits the interaction between FN and collagen but does not affect FN fibril deposition into the ECM [29]. To determine whether R1R2 impairs FN accumulation in the vessel wall, we evaluated FN levels in the vessel wall after ligation using IHC (Fig. 4). Consistent with published in vitro results, there was no significant decrease of FN intensity between vessels treated with R1R2 and treated with scrambled peptide (7 days, 0.153 ± 0.012, n = 6 vs. 0.144 ± 0.005, n = 6. 14 days: 0.309 ± 0.005, n = 7 vs. 0.338 ± 0.016, n = 7). Collectively, these data show that R1R2 treatment in injured vessels significantly limits collagen type I deposition (Fig. 3), but not FN deposition (Fig. 4) 7 days and 14 days after ligation.
R1R2 Prevents Smooth Muscle Cell Dedifferentiation, Proliferation and Migration
Leukocyte infiltration through the activated endothelium and phenotypic modulation of vascular smooth muscle cells are two hallmarks of vascular remodeling [41–43]. To further define the mechanism by which R1R2 regulates vascular remodeling, we investigated the effect of R1R2 on phenotypic modulation and leukocyte infiltration in the vessel wall. To assess the effect of R1R2 on smooth muscle phenotype, we immunostained sections of vessels 7 days post-ligation with the smooth muscle cell differentiation markers, myosin heavy chain (SM-MHC) and smooth muscle α-actin (SMAA) (Fig. 5A, 5B, and 5C). IHC analysis demonstrated that vessels treated with scrambled peptide showed significantly decreased SM-MHC (0.407 ± 0.0135, n = 8 vs. 0.717 ± 0.021, n = 6) and SMAA staining in the intima-media area (0.176 ± 0.004, n = 6 vs. 0.232 ± 0.011, n = 5). In contrast, vessels treated with R1R2 maintained the same high SM-MHC (0.541 ± 0.025, n = 7 vs. 0.407 ± 0.014, n = 8) and SMAA staining as the sham group (0.214 ± 0.004, n = 5 vs. 0.232 ± 0.011, n = 5). We also evaluated smooth muscle cell proliferation in the intima and media by performing IHC with Ki-67 (Fig. 5D). R1R2 treatment inhibited cell proliferation in the ligated artery compared to the scrambled peptide treatment (11.20 ± 0.62%, n = 5 vs. 28.77 ± 1.94%, n = 5).
SMC proliferation and migration contribute to intima and media thickening after arterial injury [44,45]. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of R1R2 on SMC proliferation and migration in vitro. R1R2 peptide significantly inhibited A7r5 SMC growth after 48–96 hours in comparison with the scrambled peptide (1.5 ± 0.224 x 105, n = 5 vs. 2.740 ± 0.688 x 105, n = 5 at 48hr)(Fig. 6A). To determine whether R1R2 affects SMC migration, a wound healing assay was performed in SMCs stimulated with PDGF-BB. As shown in Fig. 6B, cells migrated more slowly in the presence of R1R2 than in the presence of scrambled peptide 30 hours post PDGF-stimulation. A quantitative analysis of SMC migration showed that R1R2 significantly reduced SMC migration in comparison with the scrambled peptide (130149 ± 53295, n = 3 vs. 313537 ± 66925, n = 3)(Fig. 6C). Together, these data show that R1R2 inhibits smooth muscle cell phenotype modulation, proliferation, and migration.
R1R2 Inhibits Leukocyte Adhesion, Infiltration and CAM Expression
Inflammatory cell infiltration is a key event in neointimal formation after vascular injury [42,46]. Consistent with the data shown by other labs [35], reduced flow induced an increase of CD45(+) leukocytes in the intima and media 7 days post-surgery (Fig. 7). Of note, we observed a dramatic decrease in the number of CD45 (+) cells in response to R1R2 treatment (0.094 ± 0.035%, n = 5 vs. 0.441 ± 0.049%, n = 6). Furthermore, R1R2 also decreased the expression of cell adhesion molecules. IHC analysis showed that R1R2 application resulted in a dramatic reduction of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) (Fig. 7A and 7C, 10.36 ± 1.802%, n = 7 vs. 25.72 ± 1.966%, n = 9) and intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (Fig. 7A and 7D, 11.58 ± 2.387%, n = 7 vs. 30.39 ± 3.016%, n = 8) expression in comparison with control peptide-treated vessels 7 days after ligation. Additionally, immunoblotting of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 also showed a similar reduction in protein levels in the carotid artery following surgery (Fig. 7E). Taken in aggregate, our in vivo findings uncover an inhibitory effect of R1R2 peptide on leukocyte infiltration and CAM expression in the arterial wall after injury.
In injured vessels, there is increased expression of cell adhesion molecules in the activated endothelium, leading to enhanced leukocyte recruitment and transendothelial infiltration [47,48]. Our study demonstrates that there is a reduction in leukocyte infiltration in the vessel wall in R1R2-treated animals compared to scrambled peptide-treated mice (Fig. 7). To determine whether R1R2 modulates leukocyte recruitment to activated endothelial cells during inflammation, we assessed monocyte adhesion to HUVECs and transendothelial migration, which both involve interaction with cell adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. In the adhesion assay, HUVECs treated with 10 ng/ml TNF-α for 16 hours were incubated with calcein-AM stained monocyte U937 cells. As shown in Fig. 8A, TNF-α-induced monocyte U937 adhesion to HUVECs was significantly blunted by the R1R2 peptide (197697 ± 34184 vs. 259093 ± 14720). In addition, R1R2 significantly reduced monocyte transendothelial migration in comparison to control peptide (Fig. 8B, 65633 ± 20412 vs. 110055 ± 42517). To rule out the possibility that the inhibitory effect of R1R2 on U937 adhesion and transmigration was due to a decrease in endothelial cell number, we assayed the effect of R1R2 on cell proliferation in comparison with control peptide-treated cells. No significant decrease was observed between the R1R2-treated HUVECs and the control group at the start of the adhesion assay (data not shown). Consistent with our in vivo data (Fig. 7), the expression levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on HUVECs were significantly decreased with R1R2 treatment (Fig. 8C and 8D). Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of R1R2 on ICAM-1 expression was transient and detected earlier than the effect on VCAM-1 expression after TNF-α stimulation (Fig. 8D). This result is supported by a previous report showing that VCAM-1 expression is induced by ICAM-1 activation or clustering [49]. Taken together, these data show that R1R2 reduces monocyte adhesion and infiltration, as well as the expression of cell adhesion molecules by endothelial cells.
Discussion
In this study, we showed that the collagen inhibitory peptide, R1R2, is an effective inhibitor of neointimal formation induced by reduced blood flow (Fig. 2). Consistent with published in vitro data [29,30], our in vivo data demonstrate that R1R2 prevents collagen type I deposition in the ECM of the vessel wall after vascular injury (Fig. 3). R1R2 treatment maintains smooth muscle cells in the differentiated state (Fig. 5), and dramatically inhibits inflammatory cell infiltration into the vessel wall, with lower levels of ICAM and VCAM expression in the intima and media where SMCs are highly proliferative and migratory during the early stages of vascular remodeling (Fig. 7). Further, our in vitro studies demonstrate that R1R2 reduces cultured SMC proliferation and migration (Fig. 6), and also decreases monocyte adhesion and transmigration through endothelial cells (Fig. 8).
Pharmacological inhibition of collagen synthesis is known to decrease fibrotic diseases and improve organ function [50–52]. In this study, we demonstrated that R1R2 efficiently decreases collagen I deposition in the vessel wall. The compliance of the vessel wall is dependent on the relative content of two major proteins: collagen and elastin. Excess deposition of collagen is known to result in arterial stiffness [53–56]. It is well documented that elevated arterial stiffness is highly associated with atherosclerosis [57–59], and arterial stiffness is regarded as a useful marker of the extent of atherosclerosis in the aorta [60]. Hence, the ability of the R1R2 peptide to decrease collagen deposition is likely to normalize arterial wall stiffness and improve vascular function.
Activated endothelium and the subsequent inflammatory cell recruitment have been shown to be decisive players for SMC phenotypic modulation during the process of pathological vascular remodeling. Growth factors, cytokines and chemokines released by the activated endothelium and infiltrated inflammatory cells promote SMCs switching to the synthetic phenotype characterized by enhanced proliferating/migratory abilities and the expression of inflammatory transcriptional mediators, cell adhesion molecules, pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [61–64], which further exacerbate the inflammatory responses in the pathological processes of the vascular remodeling. ECM proteins are also known to modulate proinflammatory gene expression in SMCs [65,66]. For examples, SMCs cultured on collagen type IV show reduced VCAM-1 expression in comparison with SMCs cultured on collagen type I [65]. The expression of cell adhesion molecules on SMCs is thought to facilitate the accumulation of infiltrated leukocytes in the vessel wall [67,68]. The in vivo data of this study revealed that R1R2 significantly reduced VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression in the intima and media of the vessel wall after injury, suggesting that R1R2 inhibits the inflammatory reactions induced by activated endothelium, and also blocks inflammation resulting from the activation of SMCs after vascular injury.
In vitro studies have shown that FN is required as a scaffold for collagen deposition [28,29,31]. Inhibiting FN polymerization with antibodies or inhibitors prevents FN and collagen fibril deposition into the ECM in vitro [27,31]. In our previous study, we examined the effect of pUR4, a recombinant peptide derived from the F1 adhesin that is a potent inhibitor of FN polymerization in vitro [69], on flow-induced vascular remodeling. Like the R1R2 peptide in this study, the pUR4 peptide also attenuates intima-media thickening in ligated mouse vessels, decreases SMC phenotypic modulation, inhibits cell adhesion molecule expression, and decreases inflammatory cell infiltration into the vessel wall [38]. pUR4 treatment also dramatically decreases the levels of FN and collagen type I in the vessel wall after surgery in mice [38]. In this study the R1R2 peptide is shown to prevent the accumulation of collagen type I in the ECM, but does not inhibit FN accumulation. These data are consistent with our published in vitro studies showing that inhibiting FN-collagen interaction with R1R2 does not alter FN fibril formation [29]. The deposition of FN has been shown to be important for the deposition of other ECM molecules, including collagen type I [27,70,71]. Therefore, our in vivo work to inhibit collagen type I deposition with R1R2 may provide an efficient treatment to attenuate neointimal formation without interfering with the levels of other ECM proteins in tissues.
Collagen type I can act as a signaling molecule by binding to cell surface receptors. In this study, we have shown that adventitial delivery of R1R2 attenuates smooth muscle cell activation and leukocyte infiltration. We postulate that R1R2 may decrease neointimal formation by inhibiting collagen type I fibril deposition, which uncouples collagen-collagen receptor signaling. Several collagen receptors have been identified. For instance, the collagen receptor UPARAP/Endo180 has been shown to be involved in collagen endocytosis [39,50,72,73]. Collagen-binding receptors including certain integrins and DDRs, physically connect cells to collagen, and mediate cellular responses to collagen [18–22]. Integrins are heterodimers composed of two distinct subunits, α and β. ECM ligands that bind to integrin receptors initiate integrin clustering and activation, which is followed by recruitment of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) to focal adhesion complexes, and autophosphorylation of FAK [74]. α1β1 and α2β1 are the major integrin receptors for collagen type I. Blocking β1 integrin-mediated signaling is known to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration, and phenotypic transformation [75–77]. In addition, collagen-β1 integrin interactions are involved in cytokine secretion from cells [78,79], which promotes smooth muscle cell activation. α1β1 and α2β1 integrins have also been shown to play a crucial role in regulating inflammatory diseases [80]. Our data show that treatment of injured vessels with R1R2 decreases VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression in the intima and media. These results may be due to the blockade of integrin-mediated signaling by R1R2. Several reports have demonstrated that collagen-β1 integrin ligation augments ICAM-1 expression on cells in a FAK-dependent manner [81–83], and pharmacologically inhibiting FAK blocks TNF-α-induced VCAM-1 expression [84].
R1R2 may also decrease the interaction between collagen type I and DDRs, and interrupt DDR1 and DDR2-mediated signaling pathways [22]. DDRs are homodimers containing tyrosine kinase in their cytoplasmic domain [85,86]. Upon collagen binding, the receptor dimerizes and induces autophosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domains [87]. DDR1 is known to regulate smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration [22,88,89]. Additionally, DDR1 and DDR2 are activated by polymerized collagen, and overexpression of DDR1 and DDR2 increase matrix metalloproteinase activities [90]. In vivo evidence show that interruption of DDR-induced signaling pathways significantly decreases neointimal formation [88,91]. In our study, inhibiting FN-collagen binding and collagen type I deposition attenuates neointimal formation in a flow-reduced vascular remodeling model. Therefore, we speculate that inhibiting collagen type I deposition with R1R2 peptide may uncouple collagen-integrin or collagen-DDR interactions, which in turn decrease cellular responses in SMCs and endothelial cell during vascular remodeling.
It is also possible that collagen deposition affects vascular remodeling due to the ability of collagen and/or collagen binding macromolecules to sequester growth factors and cytokines in the ECM [92–94]. ECM bound cytokines and growth factors are known to influence various cellular functions including cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival [95,96]. Changes in collagen deposition are also likely to influence the migration of inflammatory cells [97,98] and the production and/or release of inflammatory cytokines [99]. Our data demonstrate that inhibiting collagen type I matrix deposition by periadventitial delivery of R1R2 can efficiently attenuate neointimal formation after injury. Furthermore, in addition to eliminating collagen type I-dependent SMC proliferation and migration, R1R2 also significantly abolishes the inflammatory responses in the vessel wall, which is likely due to the decrease in collagen type I-mediated VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression, and subsequent inflammatory cell infiltration. Our study suggests the possibility that R1R2 may have therapeutic potential for treating occlusive vascular diseases.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Joseph M. Miano (University of Rochester) and the reviewers for constructive comments.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants: NSC99-2320-B-182-019-MY2, NSC101-2320-B-182-004, NSC102-2320-B-182-007-MY3, and CMRPD 190971 to HYC in Taiwan, and RO1GM097347 to JS in USA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Larsen M, Artym VV, Green JA, Yamada KM (2006) The matrix reorganized: extracellular matrix remodeling and integrin signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18: 463–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lu P, Takai K, Weaver VM, Werb Z (2011) Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3 10.1101/cshperspect.a011510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cox TR, Erler JT (2011) Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer. Dis Model Mech 4: 165–178. 10.1242/dmm.004077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ponticos MaS, Barbara D. (2014) Extracellular matrix synthesis in vascular disease: hypertension, and atherosclerosis. J Biomed Res 28: 25–39. 10.7555/JBR.27.20130064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Raines EW (2000) The extracellular matrix can regulate vascular cell migration, proliferation, and survival: relationships to vascular disease. Int J Exp Pathol 81: 173–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Intengan HD, Schiffrin EL (2001) Vascular remodeling in hypertension: roles of apoptosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. Hypertension 38: 581–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Strauss BH, Chisholm RJ, Keeley FW, Gotlieb AI, Logan RA, et al. (1994) Extracellular matrix remodeling after balloon angioplasty injury in a rabbit model of restenosis. Circ Res 75: 650–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jacob MP (2003) Extracellular matrix remodeling and matrix metalloproteinases in the vascular wall during aging and in pathological conditions. Biomed Pharmacother 57: 195–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hynes RO (1992) Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 69: 11–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Boudreau NJ, Jones PL (1999) Extracellular matrix and integrin signalling: the shape of things to come. Biochem J 339: 481–488. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Yamada KM, Pankov R, Cukierman E (2003) Dimensions and dynamics in integrin function. Braz J Med Biol Res 36: 959–966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zhang WD, Bai HZ, Sawa Y, Yamakawa T, Kadoba K, et al. (1999) Association of smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation with extracellular matrix alterations during neointima formation in rabbit vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 30: 169–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sluijter JPG, Smeets MB, Velema E, Pasterkamp G, de Kleijn DPV (2004) Increased collagen turnover is only partly associated with collagen fiber deposition in the arterial response to injury. Cardiovasc Res 61: 186–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Coats JWD, Cheung DT, Han B, Currier JW, Faxon DP (1996) Balloon angioplasty significantly increases collagen content but does not alter collagen subtype I /III ratios in the atherosclerotic rabbit iliac model. J Mol Cell Cardiol 28: 441–446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ng K, Hildreth CM, Phillips JK, Avolio AP (2011) Aortic stiffness is associated with vascular calcification and remodeling in a chronic kidney disease rat model. F1431-F1436 p. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16. Libby P, Lee RT (2000) Matrix matters. Circulation 102: 1874–1876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bruel A, Oxlund H (1996) Changes in biomechanical properties, composition of collagen and elastin, and advanced glycation endproducts of the rat aorta in relation to age. Atherosclerosis 127: 155–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rocnik EF, Chan BM, Pickering JG (1998) Evidence for a role of collagen synthesis in arterial smooth muscle cell migration. J Clin Invest 101: 1889–1898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Koyama H, Raines EW, Bornfeldt KE, Roberts JM, Ross R (1996) Fibrillar collagen inhibits arterial smooth muscle proliferation through regulation of cdk2 inhibitors. Cell 87: 1069–1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Vaiyapuri S, Hutchinson EG, Ali MS, Dannoura A, Stanley RG, et al. (2012) Rhinocetin, a venom-derived integrin-specific antagonist inhibits collagen-induced platelet and endothelial cell functions. J Biol Chem 287: 26235–26244. 10.1074/jbc.M112.381483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wang W-L, Yeh Y-T, Chen L-J, Chiu J-J (2014) Regulation of fibrillar collagen-mediated smooth muscle cell proliferation in response to chemical stimuli by telomere reverse transcriptase through c-Myc. Biomaterials 35: 3829–3839. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lu KK, Trcka D, Bendeck MP (2011) Collagen stimulates discoidin domain receptor 1-mediated migration of smooth muscle cells through Src. Cardiovasc Pathol 20: 71–76. 10.1016/j.carpath.2009.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mosher DF (1984) Physiology of Fibronectin. Annu Rev Med 35: 561–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Owens RJ, Baralle FE (1986) Mapping the collagen-binding site of human fibronectin by expression in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 5: 2825–2830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Engvall E, Ruoslahti E, Miller EJ (1978) Affinity of fibronectin to collagens of different genetic types and to fibrinogen. J Exp Med 147: 1584–1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Little CD, Chen WT (1982) Masking of extracellular collagen and the co-distribution of collagen and fibronectin during matrix formation by cultured embryonic fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 55: 35–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sottile J, Hocking DC (2002) Fibronectin polymerization regulates the composition and stability of extracellular matrix fibrils and cell-matrix adhesions. Mol Biol Cell 13: 3546–3559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Velling T, Risteli J, Wennerberg K, Mosher DF, Johansson S (2002) Polymerization of type I and III collagens is dependent on fibronectin and enhanced by integrins α11β1 and α2β1. J Biol Chem 277: 37377–37381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Sottile J, Shi F, Rublyevska I, Chiang HY, Lust J, et al. (2007) Fibronectin-dependent collagen I deposition modulates the cell response to fibronectin. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293: C1934–1946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sevilla CA, Dalecki D, Hocking DC (2013) Regional fibronectin and collagen fibril co-assembly directs cell proliferation and microtissue morphology. PLoS One 8: e77316 10.1371/journal.pone.0077316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. McDonald JA, Kelley DG, Broekelmann TJ (1982) Role of fibronectin in collagen deposition: Fab' to the gelatin-binding domain of fibronectin inhibits both fibronectin and collagen organization in fibroblast extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 92: 485–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hofmann CS, Sullivan CP, Jiang H-Y, Stone PJ, Toselli P, et al. (2004) B-Myb represses vascular smooth muscle cell collagen gene expression and inhibits neointima formation after arterial injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24: 1608–1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lindmark H, Guss B (1999) SFS, a novel fibronectin-binding protein from Streptococcus equi, inhibits the binding between fibronectin and collagen. Infect Immun 67: 2383–2388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kumar A, Lindner V (1997) Remodeling with neointima formation in the mouse carotid artery after cessation of blood flow. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17: 2238–2244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Satoh K, Matoba T, Suzuki J, O'Dell MR, Nigro P, et al. (2008) Cyclophilin A mediates vascular remodeling by promoting inflammation and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circulation 117: 3088–3098. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Lee T-H, Chen J, Miano JM (2009) Functional characterization of a putative serine carboxypeptidase in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 105: 271–278. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.199869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Korshunov VA, Berk BC (2004) Strain-dependent vascular remodeling: the "Glagov phenomenon" is genetically determined. Circulation 110: 220–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Chiang H-Y, Korshunov VA, Serour A, Shi F, Sottile J (2009) Fibronectin is an important regulator of flow-induced vascular remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29: 1074–1079. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.181081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Lee T-H, McKleroy W, Khalifeh-Soltani A, Sakuma S, Lazarev S, et al. (2014) Functional genomic screen identifies novel mediators of collagen uptake. Mol Biol Cell 25: 583–593. 10.1091/mbc.E13-07-0382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kliment CR, Englert JM, Crum LP, Oury TD (2011) A novel method for accurate collagen and biochemical assessment of pulmonary tissue utilizing one animal. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 4: 349–355. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Gerthoffer WT (2007) Mechanisms of vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Circ Res 100: 607–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Davis C, Fischer J, Ley K, Sarembock IJ (2003) The role of inflammation in vascular injury and repair. J Thromb Haemost 1: 1699–1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Louis SZ, P (2010) Vascular smooth muscle cell motility: From migration to invasion. Exp Clin Cardiol 15: e75–e85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Raines EW, Ross R (1993) Smooth muscle cells and the pathogenesis of the lesions of atherosclerosis. Br Heart J 69: S30–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Marx SO, Totary-Jain H, Marks AR (2011) Vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation in restenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4: 104–111. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.957332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Simon DI, Dhen Z, Seifert P, Edelman ER, Ballantyne CM, et al. (2000) Decreased neointimal formation in Mac-1(-/-) mice reveals a role for inflammation in vascular repair after angioplasty. J Clin Invest 105: 293–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Carman CV, Springer TA (2008) Trans-cellular migration: cell–cell contacts get intimate. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20: 533–540. 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Muller WA (2009) Mechanisms of transendothelial migration of leukocytes. Circ Res 105: 223–230. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.200717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Lawson C, Ainsworth M, Yacoub M, Rose M (1999) Ligation of ICAM-1 on endothelial cells leads to expression of VCAM-1 via a nuclear factor-κB-independent mechanism. J Immunol 162: 2990–2996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Bickel M, Baringhaus KH, Gerl M, Gunzler V, Kanta J, et al. (1998) Selective inhibition of hepatic collagen accumulation in experimental liver fibrosis in rats by a new prolyl 4-hydroxylase inhibitor. Hepatology 28: 404–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kelley J, Newman RA, Evans JN (1980) Bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in the rat. Prevention with an inhibitor of collagen synthesis. J Lab Clin Med 96: 954–964. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Riley DJ, Berg RA, Edelman NH, Prockop DJ (1980) Prevention of collagen deposition following pulmonary oxygen toxicity in the rat by cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline. J Clin Invest 65: 643–651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Johnson CP, Baugh R, Wilson CA, Burns J (2001) Age related changes in the tunica media of the vertebral artery: implications for the assessment of vessels injured by trauma. Journal of clinical pathology 54: 139–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Zieman SJ, Melenovsky V, Kass DA (2005) Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and therapy of arterial stiffness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25: 932–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ishikawa J, Kario K, Matsui Y, Shibasaki S, Morinari M, et al. (2005) Collagen metabolism in extracellular matrix may be involved in arterial stiffness in older hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertens Res 28: 995–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Janic M, Lunder M, Sabovic M (2014) Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular therapy. Biomed Res Int 2014: 621437 10.1155/2014/621437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. van Popele NM, Grobbee DE, Bots ML, Asmar R, Topouchian J, et al. (2001) Association between arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis: The rotterdam study. Stroke 32: 454–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Kulkarni NB, Ganu MU, Godbole SG, Deo SS (2014) Effect of age and blood pressure on surrogate markers of atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Diagn Res 8: BC08–11. 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10768.5009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wang YX, Fitch RM (2004) Vascular stiffness: measurements, mechanisms and implications. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2: 379–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Hopkins KD, Lehmann ED, Gosling RG (1994) Aortic compliance measurements: A non-invasive indicator of atherosclerosis? Lancet 343: 1447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Landry DB, Couper LL, Bryant SR, Lindner V (1997) Activation of the NF-kappa B and I kappa B system in smooth muscle cells after rat arterial injury. Induction of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Am J Pathol 151: 1085–1095. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hastings NE, Feaver RE, Lee MY, Wamhoff BR, Blackman BR (2009) Human IL-8 regulates smooth muscle cell VCAM-1 expression in response to endothelial cells exposed to atheroprone flow. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29: 725–731. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.184382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Hastings NE, Simmers MB, McDonald OG, Wamhoff BR, Blackman BR (2007) Atherosclerosis-prone hemodynamics differentially regulates endothelial and smooth muscle cell phenotypes and promotes pro-inflammatory priming. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293: C1824–1833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Libby P, Li H (1993) Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and smooth muscle cell activation during atherogenesis. J Clin Invest 92: 538–539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Orr AW, Lee MY, Lemmon JA, Yurdagul A, Gomez MF, et al. (2009) Molecular mechanisms of collagen isotype-specific modulation of smooth muscle cell phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29: 225–231. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.178749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Cuff CA, Kothapalli D, Azonobi I, Chun S, Zhang Y, et al. (2001) The adhesion receptor CD44 promotes atherosclerosis by mediating inflammatory cell recruitment and vascular cell activation. J Clin Invest 108: 1031–1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Braun M, Pietsch P, Schror K, Baumann G, Felix SB (1999) Cellular adhesion molecules on vascular smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res 41: 395–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Wang X, Feuerstein GZ, Gu J-L, Lysko PG, Yue T-L (1995) Interleukin-1β induces expression of adhesion molecules in human vascular smooth muscle cells and enhances adhesion of leukocytes to smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis 115: 89–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Sottile J, Chandler J (2005) Fibronectin matrix turnover occurs through a caveolin-1-dependent process. Mol Biol Cell 16: 757–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Chung CY, Erickson HP (1997) Glycosaminoglycans modulate fibronectin matrix assembly and are essential for matrix incorporation of tenascin-C. J Cell Sci 110: 1413–1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Singh P, Carraher C, Schwarzbauer JE (2010) Assembly of fibronectin extracellular matrix. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 26: 397–419. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Wienke D, MacFadyen JR, Isacke CM (2003) Identification and characterization of the endocytic transmembrane glycoprotein Endo180 as a novel collagen receptor. Mol Biol Cell 14: 3592–3604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Sheikh H, Yarwood H, Ashworth A, Isacke CM (2000) Endo180, an endocytic recycling glycoprotein related to the macrophage mannose receptor is expressed on fibroblasts, endothelial cells and macrophages and functions as a lectin receptor. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 6): 1021–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Parsons JT, Martin KH, Slack JK, Taylor JM, Weed SA (2000) Focal adhesion kinase: a regulator of focal adhesion dynamics and cell movement. Oncogene 19: 5606–5613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Skinner MP, Raines EW, Ross R (1994) Dynamic expression of α1β1 and α2β1integrin receptors by human vascular smooth muscle cells. α2β1 integrin is required for chemotaxis across type I collagen-coated membranes. Am J Pathol 145: 1070–1081. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Nguyen TTB, Ward JPT, Hirst SJ (2005) β1-integrins mediate enhancement of airway smooth muscle proliferation by collagen and fibronectin. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171: 217–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Yamamoto M, Yamamoto K, Noumura T (1993) Type I collagen promotes modulation of cultured rabbit arterial smooth muscle cells from a contractile to a synthetic phenotype. Exp Cell Res 204: 121–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Peng Q, Lai D, Nguyen TT-B, Chan V, Matsuda T, et al. (2005) Multiple β1 integrins mediate enhancement of human airway smooth muscle cytokine secretion by fibronectin and type I collagen. J Immunol 174: 2258–2264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Miyake S, Yagita H, Maruyama T, Hashimoto H, Miyasaka N, et al. (1993) β1 integrin-mediated interaction with extracellular matrix proteins regulates cytokine gene expression in synovial fluid cells of rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Exp Med 177: 863–868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. de Fougerolles AR, Sprague AG, Nickerson-Nutter CL, Chi-Rosso G, Rennert PD, et al. (2000) Regulation of inflammation by collagen-binding integrins α1β1 and α2β1 in models of hypersensitivity and arthritis. J Clin Invest 105: 721–729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Nakayamada S, Okada Y, Saito K, Tamura M, Tanaka Y (2003) β1 integrin/focal adhesion kinase-mediated signaling induces intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and receptor activator of nuclear factor κb ligand on osteoblasts and osteoclast maturation. J Biol Chem 278: 45368–45374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Nakayamada S, Saito K, Fujii K, Yasuda M, Tamura M, et al. (2003) β1 integrin-mediated signaling induces intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and Fas on rheumatoid synovial cells and Fas-mediated apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum 48: 1239–1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Hirai F, Nakayamada S, Okada Y, Saito K, Kurose H, et al. (2007) Small GTPase Rho signaling is involved in β1 integrin-mediated up-regulation of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand on osteoblasts and osteoclast maturation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 356: 279–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Lim ST, Miller NL, Chen XL, Tancioni I, Walsh CT, et al. (2012) Nuclear-localized focal adhesion kinase regulates inflammatory VCAM-1 expression. J Cell Biol 197: 907–919. 10.1083/jcb.201109067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Leitinger B (2011) Transmembrane collagen receptors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27: 265–290. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Leitinger B, Hohenester E (2007) Mammalian collagen receptors. Matrix Biol 26: 146–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Curat CA, Eck M, Dervillez X, Vogel WF (2001) Mapping of epitopes in discoidin domain receptor 1 critical for collagen binding. J Biol Chem 276: 45952–45958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Hou G, Vogel W, Bendeck MP (2001) The discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase DDR1 in arterial wound repair. J Clin Invest 107: 727–735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Hou G, Wang D, Bendeck MP (2012) Deletion of discoidin domain receptor 2 does not affect smooth muscle cell adhesion, migration, or proliferation in response to type I collagen. Cardiovasc Pathol 21: 214–218. 10.1016/j.carpath.2011.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Fu H-L, Valiathan RR, Arkwright R, Sohail A, Mihai C, et al. (2013) Discoidin domain receptors: unique receptor tyrosine kinases in collagen-mediated signaling. J Biol Chem 288: 7430–7437. 10.1074/jbc.R112.444158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Shyu KG, Wang BW, Kuan P, Chang H (2008) RNA interference for discoidin domain receptor 2 attenuates neointimal formation in balloon injured rat carotid artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 28: 1447–1453. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.165993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Douglas T, Heinemann S, Bierbaum S, Scharnweber D, Worch H (2006) Fibrillogenesis of collagen types I, II, and III with small leucine-rich proteoglycans decorin and biglycan. Biomacromolecules 7: 2388–2393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Grafe I, Yang T, Alexander S, Homan EP, Lietman C, et al. (2014) Excessive transforming growth factor-β signaling is a common mechanism in osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Med 20: 670–675. 10.1038/nm.3544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Macri L, Silverstein D, Clark RAF (2007) Growth factor binding to the pericellular matrix and its importance in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59: 1366–1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Vlodavsky I, Bar-Shavit R, Ishai-Michaeli R, Bashkin P, Fuks Z (1991) Extracellular sequestration and release of fibroblast growth factor: a regulatory mechanism? Trends Biochem Sci 16: 268–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Lin F, Ren XD, Pan Z, Macri L, Zong WX, et al. (2011) Fibronectin growth factor-binding domains are required for fibroblast survival. J Invest Dermatol 131: 84–98. 10.1038/jid.2010.253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Postlethwaite AE, Kang AH (1976) Collagen-and collagen peptide-induced chemotaxis of human blood monocytes. J Exp Med 143: 1299–1307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Afonso PV, McCann CP, Kapnick SM, Parent CA (2013) Discoidin domain receptor 2 regulates neutrophil chemotaxis in 3D collagen matrices. Blood 121: 1644–1650. 10.1182/blood-2012-08-451575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Poitevin S, Garnotel R, Antonicelli F, Gillery P, Nguyen P (2008) Type I collagen induces tissue factor expression and matrix metalloproteinase 9 production in human primary monocytes through a redox-sensitive pathway. J Thromb Haemost 6: 1586–1594. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03051.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.