Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 7;15:6. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0127-1

Table 2.

Data on use of COMPASS in the clinical setting

Generic pattern of use by clinicians (N = 10) F (%F)
Cases
Treated patients 17
Untreated patients 8
Overall 25
Platform
iPad 23
web 3
Category of use
Clinical decision making 12
Obtain more detail on likely patient benefit 3
Risk presentations shared with relatives/patients 14
Other clinical activity 2
Opportunity for use, but not used
Decision aid was unavailable 1
Not used for other reason 7
Risk presentations shared with patients/relatives (N = 14)
Period when risk presentation was shared
Before infusion 3
After infusion 10
Justify decision not to offer thrombolysis 1
Risk presentation shared with:
Patient 1
Relative(s) 10
Patient and relative(s) 3
Mode of risk presentation
iPad 11
Paper 3
Form of risk presentation
Pictograph 14
Clustered bar chart 1
Flowchart/stacked bar graph 0
Logged data, N = 21 cases
Risk presentations viewed
Pictograph 21
Clustered Bar Graph 9
Flowchart and stacked bar graphs 6
Use of additional features
NIHSS calculator 6
Weight convertor 6
Save function 6
Timeline 5
Print function 3
Time in use (minutes) 2.8 (7.6)*

*Median (IQR).