Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 6;15(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0358-z

Table 2.

Mitotype determination by PCR analysis (combination II)

Tumour sample 1 Spores analysed LRI1 (F type) 2 (m1) LRII1 (W type) 2 (m2)
a b c d a b c d
Δatg11#1 8 0 0 0 6 8 0 0 0
Δatg11#2 10 0 0 0 5 10 0 0 0
Δatg11#3 21 0 0 0 8 21 0 0 0
Δatg11#4 10 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 0
Δatg11#5 9 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
Δatg11#6 11 0 0 0 3 11 0 0 0
Δatg11#7 11 0 0 0 3 11 0 0 0
Δatg11#8 11 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 0
Δatg11#9 11 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 0
Δatg11#10 10 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0
Δatg11#11 11 0 0 0 3 11 0 0 0
Σ 123 0 0 0 39 (31.7) 3 123 0 0 0
wt #12 10 0 0 0 5 10 0 0 0
wt #13 10 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 0
wt #14 10 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0
wt #15 9 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0
wt #16 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0
wt #17 11 0 0 0 3 11 0 0 0
wt #18 11 0 0 0 5 11 0 0 0
wt #19 11 0 0 0 3 11 0 0 0
wt #20 11 0 0 0 3 11 0 0 0
wt #21 11 0 0 0 5 11 0 0 0
wt #22 9 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
wt #23 11 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 0
Σ 122 0 0 0 32 (26.2) 3 122 0 0 0

1Wt strain combination: FB1/pMB2-2 x GF5/pKS1; Δatg11 strain combination: FB1Δatg11/pMB2-2 × GF5Δatg11/pKS1.

2Relative percentages of band intensities are indicated as: a) >97%, b) >50-97%, c) 3-50%, d) <3%.

3Values expressed in percentages (%).