Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2014 Jun 21;24(4):451–457. doi: 10.1002/pon.3605

Table 1.

Demographics for radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy patients who completed follow-up quality of life sexual function and anxiety questions (N=350)

Variable Overall N = 350a
1.    PCa, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; RRP, Radical retropubic prostatecomy.
2.    a
The sample median (minimum, 25th percentile, 75th percentile, maximum) is given for numerical variables, n (%) for
categorical variables.
M‘Age at treatment (years) 63.8 (42.7, 59.0, 67.8, 78.1)
Marital status
  Married 311 (89%)
  Single 14 (4%)
  Separated/divorced 22 (6%)
  Widowed 3 (1%)
Race—White 315 (90%)
History of erectile dysfunction (Unknown in 40) 147/310 (47%)
Diabetes 31 (9%)
Family history of PCa 99 (28%)
Preoperative PSA (Unknown in 7)
  <4 70 (20%)
  4–10 245 (71%)
  >10–20 23 (7%)
  >20 5 (2%)
Pretreatment Gleason score (missing in n = 1)
  4–6 187 (54%)
  7 122 (35%)
  8–10 40 (11%)
Pathological Gleason score
  6 127 (36%)
  7 191 (55%)
  8–10 32 (9%)
Treatment type
RRP 154 (44%)
Laproscopic 196 (56%)
T stage (Unknown in 1)
  1c 2 (1%)
  2a,2b 66 (19%)
  2c 236 (68%)
  3a,3b 45 (13%)
Prostatic capsule involvement (unknown in 4) 69/346 (20%)
Positive margins (unknown in 1) 99/349 (28%)
Seminal vesicle involvement (unknown in 2) 20/348 (6%)
Nerve sparing
  No 34 (10%)
  Full 291 (83%)
  Partial 25 (7%)
PSA 6–18 months post surgery (Missing in n = 49)
  0–0.1 267 (89%)
  >0.1–0.5 23 (8%)
  >0.5–2 7 (2%)
  >2–4 2 (1%)
  >4–<10 1 (<1%)
  >10 1 (<1%)