Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 4;4(1):89–104. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i1.89

Table 5.

Delphi list for animal studies evaluating gut and pancreatic microhemodynamics

Lundberg et al[19] Tanaka et al [23] Väisänen et al [25] Spackman et al [26] Gould et al [20] Michelet et al [22] Kortgen et al [27] Meierhenrich et al [21] Trepenaitis et al [24]
Treatment allocation
Was a method of randomization performed? No No No Yes N/A No No No No
Was the treatment allocation concealed? No No No Yes N/A No No No No
Were the groups similar at baseline regarding the most important progNostic indicators? N/A Yes Don't know Yes N/A Yes No Yes Yes
Were the eligibility criteria specified? No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Was the outcome assessor blinded? No No No Yes N/A Don't know Don't know Yes No
Was the care providor blinded? No No No No N/A No No No No
Was the patient blinded? No Don't know No Yes N/A No No No No
Were point estimates and measures of vari ability presented for the primary outcome measures? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Did the analysis include an intention-to-treat analysis? N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A