Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 16;14(1):35–48. doi: 10.1111/acel.12296

Table 1.

Dual RNAi effects on mean aggregate numbers per worm

RNAi-1 RNAi-2 Mean count SEM KD, % of control Two-tailed t-test Predicted KD% (ifindependent)
FV (empty vector) FV 64.5 1.1
age-1 FV 52.5 2.2 81 1.5E−05
daf-16 FV 49.1 1.6 76 4.0E−09
hsf-1 FV 57.0 1.4 88 1.6E−04
pha-4 FV 53.8 1.2 83 1.6E−07
cram-1 FV 51.4 1.0 80 1.3E−09
age-1 cram-1 33.7 1.3 52 5.7E−18 0.81 × 0.80 = 65%
daf-16 cram-1 40.1 1.9 62 9.9E−13 0.76 × 0.80 = 61%
hsf-1 cram-1 40.7 1.0 63 1.1E−17 0.88 × 0.80 = 71%
pha-4 cram-1 38.9 1.6 60 1.5E−14 0.83 × 0.80 = 67%

Dual RNAi AM141 worms were assessed at 4 days posthatch (dPH), 14–19 fields per group with 1–4 worms per field. Aggregate counts for fields with multiple worms were divided by N and treated as single data points. Significance was assessed by two-tailed, homoscedastic t-tests, for differences between each indicated treatment group and the feeding vector control (FV/FV, no RNAi). Predicted knockdown percent for dual RNAi treatments was calculated by multiplying the percent of control for each RNAi used alone.