Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 23;15(1):1–21. doi: 10.3390/s150100001

Table 1.

Review of environmental sources of air pollution malodour evaluated using e-nose.

Source of Malodours Type of Sensor; Sampling; Measurement Analysis Method Description Reference
landfill gas odors 16 tin oxide sensors; 20 L/min; meas. 90 s ANN (35 neurons in hid. layer) high correlation of particular sensors with odour concentration, low prediction network error (MSE) for MLP 0.000410 and RBF 0.000755 in the range of 0 to 200 ouE/m3 [18]
landfill site 3 × EOS835; 6 thin film MOS; 180 mL/min; 3 min meas./12 min recovery [19] PCA quantification of time percentage when the presence of odours is perceived at the landfill boundaries and near vicinity, comparison of e-nose data with meteorological measurements [20]
waste disposal, landfill areas 6 to 8 tin oxide sensors multilinear regression correlation (R2 = 0.88) response of TGS822 sensor with odour concentration in the range of 0 to 1500 ouE/m3 [21]
waste incineration plant 6QMB; 400 mL/min absorption, 40 mL/min desorption; PCA correlation of particular sensor response with odour concentration in the range of 0 to 500 ouE/m3, detection of charcoal filter conditions [22]
composting plant 6 MOS; 200 mL/min PCA Correlation of e-nose response with odour concentration in the range of 0 to 1500 ouE/m3, classification of air contamination from compost hall [23]
composting plant EOS835 25; 6MOS; 3 min meas./12 min recovery PCA 96.4% classification accuracy of quantitative recognition test of odour source, high correlation (R = 0.95) e-nose response with odour concentration in the range of 20 to 50 ouE/m3 [24]
composting plant EOS3; 6MOS; EOS9; 6MOS; 3 min meas./9 min recovery PCA, Fourier 72% classification accuracy of quantitative recognition test of odour source, high correlation (R = 0.89) e-nose response with odour concentration in the range of 0 to 100 ouE/m3, response of e-nose compliant with human perception of nuisance [25]
poultry farm 12 sensors (MOS, hybrid, tin dioxide, tungsten oxide) ANN accurate odour strength prediction with e-nose (R = 0.93) [26]
poultry shed 24 MOS, 500 mL/min PCA, PLS high correlation of e-nose with odour concentration (R = 0.94) in the range of 0 to 4000 ouE/m3 [27]
piggery building Aromascan A32S; 32CP PCA, PLS, ANN (Matlab) correlation of e-nose with odour concentration PCA (R2 = 0.44), PLS R2 = 0.79, ANN R2 = 0.62 with, estimation of biofilter efficiency [28]
swine manure storage Aromascan A32S; 32 CP ANN 12 hid. neur. (NeuroShell2) low correlation (R2 = 0.46) e-nose with odour concentration in the range of 0 to 5000 ouE/m3 [29]
piggery effluent ponds Aromascan A32S; 32 CP PCA, ANN (20 hid. neur., Matlab) high correlation of e-nose with odour concentration (R = 0.98) in the range of 0 to 90 ouE/m3 [30]
cattle slurry Odourmapper; 20 CP (polyindol); 100 mL/min; Aromascan A32S; 32 CP (polypyrrole); 100 mL/min PCA (Genstat) correlation of average e-nose response with odour concentration in the range of 0 to 1000 ouE/m3 [31]
livestock waste 20× CP polypyrrolee PCA discrimination of different odours [32]
rendering plant 6QMB + 6MOS + O2 + H2O + CO + CO2; 3 s sample pulse, 60 s post-sampling measurement PCA, PLS sufficient correlation of e-nose with odour concentration in the range of 1000 to 30000 ouE/m3; biofilter controls [33]
buildings material KAMINA; 38 oxide gas sensor on chip LDA, PLS discrimination of different materials, correlation of e-nose response with perceived smell intensity in the range of 0 to 16 π (π is comparative unit determined on basis acetone vapours) [34]

PCA—principal component analysis, CP—conducting polymer, MOS—metal oxide semiconductors, PLS—partial least squares, ANN—artificial neural network, QMB—quartz crystal microbalance, TON—threshold odour number, CCA—canonical correlation analysis, DFA—discriminant function analysis, LDA—linear discriminant analysis, ouE/m3—European odour unit per cubic meter.