Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 14;15(1):1635–1675. doi: 10.3390/s150101635

Table 2.

Combinations of anchors and spacers that render substrates inert to non-specific biomolecular binding.

Type Graphic Example Advantages Disadvantages Surface Materials Examples
Proteins graphic file with name sensors-15-01635t3.jpg easy to handle general biocompatible unspecific to surface material, surface patches exposed, non-specific binding and orientation relatively general bovine serum albumin fibrinogen milk proteins
Self-assembled monolayers graphic file with name sensors-15-01635t4.jpg applicable to many surface materials receptor exposure good small substrate defects alter function, low resistance to fouling Au, Ag,
SiO2, TiO2,
Al2O3
OEG-thiols
OEG-silanes
Surface-grafted polymer brushes graphic file with name sensors-15-01635t5.jpg surface chemistry specific grafting grafting from of any spacer mix and match functionality by grafting to difficult to control surface density, low availability of functional group Au, Ag,
SiO2, TiO2,
Al2O3,
Fe3O4,
Fe2O3
PEG-thiols
PEG-silanes
PEG-DOPA3
PEG-nitrocatechols
Physisorbed graft copolymer brushes graphic file with name sensors-15-01635t6.jpg applicable to many surface materials low defect intensity known density of functional groups large surface area per macromolecule, low availability of functional group, non-specific surface attachment Au, Ag,
SiO2, TiO2,
Nb2O5,
Si3N4,
Al2O3,
PLL-g-PEG
PLL-g-PMOXA
Pluronics®
Amphiphilic membranes graphic file with name sensors-15-01635t7.jpg cell membrane mimic multivalancy through lateral mobility cannot be dried, limited to certain surface materials SiO2, TiO2,
ITO,
hydrophobic surfaces
Lipids block-co-polymers