TABLE 5. Total number of patients, total number of teeth examined, frequency of AP, ET and frequency of teeth with ET associated with AP in different studies.
Author/Country | No. of Patients | No. of Teeth | Teeth w/AP (%)* | Teeth w/ET (%)* | Teeth w/ET/AP (%)** |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
This study (São Luís, Brazil) | 200 | 5008 | 5.9 | 11 | 42.5 |
De Cleen et al. (Germany 1993) | 184 | 4196 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 39.2 |
Buckley & Spangberg. (USA 1995) | 208 | 5272 | 4.1 | 5.5 | 31.3 |
Sidaravicius et al. (Lithuania. 1999) | 147 | 3892 | 7.2 | 15.0 | 39.4 |
De Moor et al. (Belgium 2000) | 206 | 4617 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 40.4 |
Lupi-Peguirier et al. (France 2002) | 344 | 7561 | 7.3 | 18.5 | 31.5 |
Dugas et al. (Canada 2003) | 610 | 16148 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 45.5 |
Jiménez-Pizón et al. (Spain, 2004) | 180 | 4453 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 64.5 |
percent values apply to the number of teeth examined
percent values apply to the number of endodontically treated teeth