Table 3.
Issue | Respondents | Expanded Comments |
---|---|---|
Diabetes | 20 | Surgery more likely/earlier (11); More aggressive approach (4); Arthroscopic arthrolysis more likely (3) |
Chronicity | 9 | Surgery more likely/earlier (5) |
Degree of stiffness | 9 | Arthroscopic release in severe stiffness (4); Other response: MUA is first choice for severe stiffness; poor results with hydro-dilatation in severe stiffness; MUA plus steroid injection in severe early phase stiffness. |
Conservative management failure | 9 | Surgery more likely/earlier |
Functional loss | 8 | Surgery more likely/earlier (4) |
Patient led decision process | 7 | Discussion of disease course, activities of daily living/requirements, risks, benefits and success rate of intervention (6) |
Underlying cause | 4 | MUA contraindicated in osteoporosis |
Recurrence | 3 | MUA for early recurrence following arthroscopic release; More aggressive approach |
Bilateral disease | 2 | More aggressive approach; contralateral disease requires surgery |
Other responses | MUA if resistant to distension; open arthrolysis used for secondary revision only; Capsular distension if general anaesthetic contraindicated; all patients excluding diabetics are treated by supervised neglect; MUA for uncomplicated Frozen Shoulder; previous dislocation then avoid MUA. If anaesthetic issues more likely to use MUA. |
Numbers in brackets corresponds to the number of respondents expanding on the issue, MUA Manipulation Under Anaesthesia.