Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 30;44:97–109. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0115

Table 3.

Influence of CET and SIT on indices of the Wingate all-out test

CET (n=7) SIT (n=8)

Week No M ± SD Δ% p d Week No M ± SD Δ% p d
PP (W·kg−1) W0 11.4 ± 1.4 9.6 0.008* 0.935 W0 12.3 ± 1.7ǂ 8.9 0.011* 0.686
W7 12.5 ± 0.9 W7 13.4 ± 1.5#
AP (W·kg−1) W0 8.10 ± 0.50 3.7 0.033* 0.663 W0 8.28 ± 0.70 3.9 <0.001* 0.457
W7 8.40 ± 0.40 W7 8.60 ± 0.70
FI (%) W0 44.0 ± 10.1 18.6 0.122 0.816 W0 51.2 ± 6.0 6.4 0.091 0.602
W7 52.2 ± 10.0 W7 54.5 ± 4.9
tPP (s) W0 1.94 ± 0.73 −34.5 0.074 −1.195 W0 1.39 ± 0.37 −12.3 0.092 −0.559
W7 1.27 ± 0.31 W7 1.22 ± 0.22
PD (%) W0 57.0 ± 8.9 9.8 0.086 0.636 W0 64.2 ± 6.8 0.8 0.811 0.083
W7 62.6 ± 8.7 W7 64.7 ± 5.1
*

p≤0.05,

ǂ

p=0.040,

#

p=0.004 (statistically significantly higher compared with data of CET), CET: continuous endurance training, SIT: sprint interval training, PP: peak power, AP: average power, FI: fatigue index, tPP: time to peak power, PD: power drop, M: mean, SD: standard deviation, Δ%: percentage change in means, d: Cohen’s d (<0.2 trivial; 0.2 ≤ d < 0.5 small; 0.5 ≤ d < 0.8 moderate; d ≥ 0.8 large effect size), W: week