Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 30;44:97–109. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0115

Table 5.

Influence of CET and SIT on indices of the lipid profile

CET (n=7) SIT (n=8)

Week No M ± SD Δ% p D Week No M ± SD Δ% p d
TC (mg/dl) W0 164 ± 26.8 1.2 0.749 0.086 W0 178 ± 31.4 −1.1 0.817 −0.057
W7 166 ± 18.9 W7 176 ± 38.8
HDL (mg/dl) W0 48.1 ± 5.60 −1.5 0.747 −0.125 W0 51.0 ± 10.7 2.9 0.111 0.142
W7 47.4 ± 5.60 W7 52.5 ± 10.5
LDL (mg/dl) W0 98.6 ± 22.1 0.8 0.813 0.039 W0 104 ± 27.9 6.7 0.345 0.247
W7 99.4 ± 18.8 W7 111 ± 29
VLDL (mg/dl) W0 17.1 ± 10.2 9.4 0.368 0.135 W0 23.0 ± 7.50 −6.1 0.562 −0.166
W7 18.7 ± 13.3 W7 21.6 ± 9.30
TG (mg/dl) W0 86.0 ± 51.4 8.1 0.420 0.117 W0 115 ± 38.1 −6.1 0.543 −0.166
W7 93.0 ± 67.0 W7 108 ± 45.9

CET: continuous endurance training, SIT: sprint interval training, TC: total cholesterol, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein, TG: triglyceride, M: mean, SD: standard deviation, Δ%: percentage change in means, d: Cohen’s d (<0.2 trivial; 0.2 ≤ d < 0.5 small; 0.5 ≤ d < 0.8 moderate; d ≥ 0.8 large effect size), W: week