Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;17(4):307–314. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000400008

TABLE 1. ART scoring number and percent distribution of both RMGI and GIC-ART restorations at baseline (Scores 0 and 7 are successful) and comparison of two materials (p<0.05).

Art Scoring RMGI GIC
One surface Two surfaces One surface Two surface
Baseline 0 31 (100%) 21 (100%) 22 (100%) 17 (100%)
6-Month 0 30 (96.8%) 18 (85.7%) 18 (81.8%) 5 (29.4%)
1 1 (3.2%) 3 (14.3%) 3 (13.6%) 9 (52.9%)
2 1 (5.9%)
3 1 (5.9%)
4 1 (5.9%)
7 1 (4.5%)
12-Month 0 29 (100%) 15 (71.4%) 16 (76.2%) 4 (23.5%)
1 6 (28.6%) 2 (9.5%) 4 (23.5%)
2 2 (9.5%) 4 (23.5%)
3 1 (5.9%)
4 2 (11.8%)
7 1 (4.8%) 2 (11.8%)
24-Month 0 29 (100%) 15 (71.4%) 15 (71.4%) 2 (11.8%)
1 6 (28.6%) 2 (9.5%) 3 (17.6%)
2 2 (9.5%) 3 (17.6%)
3 2 (9.5%) 1 (5.9%)
4 6 (35.3%)
7 2 (11.8%)