Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2015 Feb 12;10(3):442–458. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.191

Table 2.

A comparison of the microscopy platforms tested for FISSEQ.

Model Pros Cons Uses
Wide-field epifluorescence Nikon TE-2000 Fast imaging Simple set-up Poor axial resolution Low S/N ratio Lower read depth Thin cells & tissue sections Whole cell barcode labeling
Scanning confocal Zeiss LSM 710 confocal Leica TCS SP5 Confocal Good axial resolution Scanning zoom Flexible pixel density Slow imaging High resolution FISSEQ of a single region
Spinning disk confocal Yokogawa CSU-W1 Fast imaging Good axial resolution Fixed pixel density All-purpose