Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1975 Jul;72(7):2501–2505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.7.2501

Attraction of the oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis, to methyl eugenol and related olfactory stimulants.

R L Metcalf, W C Mitchell, T R Fukuto, E R Metcalf
PMCID: PMC432796  PMID: 1058469

Abstract

The attraction of male oriental fruit flies to methyl eugenol and 34 analogues was investigated quantitatively using the characteristic feeding response. Methyl eugenol was the most active compound studied, with a feeding response to 0.01 mug, but saturation of the allyl side chain or replacement of allyl by allyloxy produced compounds almost as effective. Replacement of the methoxy groups by methylenedioxy, methyl, or chloro groups abolished all response. The ring geometry of the methoxy groups was critical, with orthodimethoxy most active and meta-dimethoxy inactive. Replacement of methoxy with hydroxy, methylthio, or amino groups did not abolish the response. The failure of the oriental fruit fly to respond to the methyl and chloro isosteres of methyl eugenol was contrasted with the response of a human odor panel which perceived these compounds as having weak floral odors.

Full text

PDF
2505

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AMOORE J. E. CURRENT STATUS OF THE STERIC THEORY OF ODOR. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Jul 30;116:457–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb45075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amoore J. E., Palmieri G., Wanke E., Blum M. S. Ant alarm pheromone activity: correlation with molecular shape by scanning computer. Science. 1969 Sep 19;165(3899):1266–1269. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3899.1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boeckh J., Kaissling K. E., Schneider D. Insect olfactory receptors. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:263–280. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koshland D. E., Jr, Neet K. E. The catalytic and regulatory properties of enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1968;37:359–410. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.37.070168.002043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roelofs W. L., Comeau A. Sex pheromone perception. Nature. 1968 Nov 9;220(5167):600–601. doi: 10.1038/220600a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schneider D. Insect olfaction: deciphering system for chemical messages. Science. 1969 Mar 7;163(3871):1031–1037. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3871.1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES