Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 26;25(3):850–859. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3431-3

Table 1.

Screening performance indicators for screen-film mammography and digital mammography

Screen-film mammography Digital mammography p valuea
n % n %
Screened womenb 39,182 43,406
Screening mammograms 82,961 79,031
 Initial screening 21,187 14,532
 Successive screening 61,774 64,499
Cancer detection rate 345 0.42 339 0.43 0.685
 Initial screening 82 0.39 80 0.55 0.024
 Successive screening 263 0.43 259 0.40 0.503
Invasive carcinomas detection rate 295 0.36 264 0.33 0.462
 Initial screening 66 0.31 61 0.42 0.091
 Successive screening 229 0.37 203 0.31 0.089
In situ carcinoma detection rate 45 0.05 70 0.09 0.010
 Initial screening 12 0.06 18 0.12 0.031
 Successive screening 33 0.05 52 0.08 0.063
Interval cancer ratec 114 0.14 112 0.14 0.816
 Initial screening 39 0.18 32 0.22 0.447
 Successive screening 75 0.12 80 0.12 0.895
Recall rate 4,628 5.57 3,316 4.20 <0.001
 Initial screening 2,331 11.00 1,705 11.73 0.032
 Successive screening 2,297 3.72 1,611 2.50 <0.001
False-positive for any proceduresd 3,970 4.79 2,675 3.38 <0.001
 Initial screening 1,872 8.84 1,165 8.02 0.006
 Successive screening 2,098 3.40 1,510 2.34 <0.001
Sensitivity 75.16 75.17 0.960
 Initial screening 67.77 71.43 0.877
 Successive screening 77.81 76.40 0.921
Specificity 95.19 96.60 0.040
 Initial screening 91.11 91.92 0.578
 Successive screening 96.59 97.65 0.175
Positive predictive value 8.00 11.25 <0.001
 Initial screening 4.20 6.43 0.010
 Successive screening 11.14 14.64 0.004

aChi-square test

bThe total number of screened women is not the sum of women screened with screen-film and full-field digital mammography, because some women were screened during both periods (n = 23,126)

cThe interval cancer rate was calculated as the number of interval cancers over the number of screened women minus women with screen-detected cancer in the same period

dNoninvasive and invasive procedures