Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 19;166(1):4–17. doi: 10.1111/aab.12191

Table 3.

Comparison of commercially available virtual impactors for air sampling

Sampler Description References Flow Rate (L min−1) Collection Efficiency d50 (µm)* Sample period Compatible with analysis method
Culture Microscope Biosensor/ Molecular
VeroTect bio-detector http://www.biral.com/bio-detectors/biodetectors Virtual Impactor Shelton et al. (2004) 33 0.5 Continual
Aerosol Size And Shape Characterisation and additional generic characterisation by particle fluorescence using 280 nm excitation can provide a simple yes/no indication of biological particles or a more sophisticated analysis package for research use.
Biral Aspect http://www.biral.com/imagprod/downloads/Aspect.pdf Virtual Impactor Shelton et al. (2004) ? ? Continual
Aspect uses light scattering to measure particle shape as well as size and so is suitable for small particles and high throughput rates than systems that rely on particle imaging.
Burkard Jet spore sampler http://www.burkard.co.uk/jetsamp.htm Virtual Impactor Limpert et al. (1999) 850 1–2 (estimate) Up to several days Yes Yes Yes
Miniature Virtual Impactor (MVI) Miniature Virtual Impactor West et al. (2013) 20 2 (estimate) Up to several days Yes Yes Yes
*

d50 is the aerodynamic diameter or size of particles above which 50% or more are collected and below which, less than 50% are collected.