Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 15;44(Suppl 2):286–296. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0622-8

Table 2.

Average dissolved P concentration upstream of the dispenser unit, (unweighted) mean reduction in dissolved P due to ferric sulfate application and (per kg dissolved P) chemical use and estimated cost of the treatment at the 15 study sites

Site Dissolved P concentration mg L−1 Mean reduction in dissolved P conc. % Ferric sulfate use in kg per kg dissolved P converted Costs in EUR per kg dissolved P converted
Nautela 0.064 54 211 134a
N1 0.069 79 583 204
N2 0.062 33 243 85
N3 1.20 62 254 89
N4 0.071 78 909 318
N5 0.65 67 394 138
N6 0.020 77 953 334
N7 0.021 75 687 240
N8 1.10 79 39 14
N9 0.032 57 1241 434
N10 0.36 >95 71 25
T1 4.01 86 45 16
P1 0.061 61 417 146
P2 0.069 81 473 165
P3 0.154 79 216 76
All sites (95 % CI) 66 (61–70) 448 (248–650) 157 (87–228)b

aAt Nautela, the ferric sulfate cost 0.46 EUR kg−1 in 2011 and 0.55 EUR kg−1 in 2012; at the other sites it cost 0.35 EUR kg−1

bCalculated with the 0.35 EUR kg−1 ferric sulfate price