Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 May 19;82(4):706–720. doi: 10.1037/a0036920

Table 3.

Overall Effect Sizes (Hedges’ g) and 95% Confidence Intervals for Secondary Measures (N = 72)

Measure FBT TAU
Primary Measures
CAPI Abuse Scale
    6-mo. post- .41 (−.11, .94) .23 (−.25, .70)
    10-mo. post- .41 (−.10, .92) .27 (−.21, .74)
TLFB Hard Drug Use
    6-mo. post- .41 (−.11, .93) .31 (−.16, .79)
    10-mo. post- .39 (−.12, .90) .45 (−.02, .93)
TLFB Marijuana Use
    6-mo. post- .74 (.22, 1.27) .55 (.07, 1.04)
    10-mo. post- .63 (.12, 1.15) .53 (.06, 1.01)
Secondary Measures
HIV RAB Total
    Baseline-to-post .33 (−.19, .85) .00 (−.48, .48)
    Baseline-to-follow-up .33 (−.18, .84) .24 (−.24, .71)
Hours Worked
    6-mo. post- −.18 (−.70, .34) .23 (−.25, .71)
    10-mo. post- −.30 (−.80, .21) .04 (−.43, .52)
Alcohol Intoxication
    6-mo. post- .31 (−.21, .83) .11 (−.37, .59)
    10-mo. post- .37 (−.14, .88) .33 (−.14, .81)
Incarceration
    6-mo. post- .02 (−.50, .54) −.40 (−.88, .08)
    10-mo. post- .03 (−.48, .54) −.35 (−.83, .12)
Child In DFS Custody
    6-mo. post- −.24 (−.76, .28) −.28 (−.76, .19)
    10-mo. post- −.04 (−.55, .47) −.12 (−.59, .36)

Note. CAPI = Child Abuse Potential Inventory. In the interpretation of Hedges’ g absolute magnitude from zero demonstrates larger effect sizes: small = ±.2, medium = ±.5, and large = ±.8 (Cohen, 1988).