Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb 14;7(2):244–250. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000548

Table 3.

Comparison of Baseline Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation With Different Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Devices

IABP (N=22) Non-IABP Combined
(N=44)
Non-IABP Subgroups Total (N=66) P Value (IABP vs
Non-IABP)

Impella (N=25) TandemHeart (N=19)
Inducible VTs at the end of the procedure, mean±SD 0.32±0.48 0.32±0.46 0.35±0.47 0.26±0.45 0.31±0.46 0.853
Acute success, % 19 (86) 39 (89) 21 (84) 18 (95) 58 (88) 0.790
Major complications, % 3 (14) 14 (32) 9 (36) 5 (19) 17 (26) 0.143
  Hematoma 2 (10) 6 (14) 4 (16) 2 (11) 8 (12)
  Pericardial tamponade 1 (5) 5 (11) 4 (16) 1 (5) 6 (9)
  Arteriovenous fistula 0 1 (2) 0 1 (5) 1 (2)
  Myocardial infarction 0 1 (2) 1 (5) 0 1 (2)
  Death in the EP laboratory 0 1 (2) 0 1 (5) 1 (2)
Days in the hospital, mean±SD 7.2±3.9 8.2±7.7 8.1±9.2 8.4±5.3 7.9±6.7 0.561
Death in the hospital, % 5 (23) 6 (14) 3 (12) 3 (16) 11 (17) 0.350
Recurrence of VT, % 11 (50) 18 (42) 11 (46) 7 (37) 29 (45) 0.532
Repeat VT ablation, % 7 (32) 7 (16) 4 (16) 3 (16) 14 (21) 0.136
Death in 12 mo, % 8 (36) 12 (36) 8 (32) 4 (21) 20 (30) 0.449

IABP indicates intra-aortic balloon pump; EP, electrophysiology; and VT, ventricular tachycardia.