Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar;105(3):e66–e72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302393

TABLE 2—

Cyberbullying Characteristics in a Probability Sample of Middle-School Students: Supplement to the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, Los Angeles County, CA, 2012

Victim–Perpetrators (n = 32)
Variable Perpetrators (n = 50), Unweighted No. (Weighted %) Victims (n = 60), Unweighted No. (Weighted %) Victimization, Unweighted No. (Weighted %) Perpetration, Unweighted No. (Weighted %)
Cyberbullying digital medium
 Facebook 28 (27.89) 36 (60.37) 22 (70.27) 24 (73.16)
 Myspace 3 (3.67) 3 (2.33) 5 (13.79) 4 (11.31)
 E-mail 3 (6.52) 1 (1.72) 4 (3.40) 1 (3.87)
 Text 15 (26.76) 16 (25.71) 14 (39.85) 12 (43.33)
 Instant message 7 (14.03) 3 (3.75) 4 (12.70) 2 (6.35)
 Other 14 (30.95) 19 (31.51) 9 (26.61) 8 (29.02)
 More than 1 place 11 (21.73) 11 (16.19) 12 (32.86) 13 (43.78)
Relationship between cyberbully and cybervictim
 Someone I know in real life 35 (71.75) 37 (64.54) 19 (65.65) 24 (79.42)
 Someone I know online 10 (19.80) 18 (29.38) 14 (40.40) 6 (21.88)
 Someone I don’t know 11 (21.07) 10 (20.22) 8 (22.62) 8 (20.58)