Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 17.
Published in final edited form as: Ecography. 2014 Dec 1;37(12):1288–1291. doi: 10.1111/ecog.00680

Table 1.

Comparison of selected population genetic software: a) The simulation approach taken, either forwards-in-time or backwards-in-time; b) units of the simulation (individuals or populations) for which x/y-coordinates are modeled and whether the resolution is continuous or on a lattice; c) whether selection of abiotic and/or biotic environment for specific phenotypes is allowed; d) the approach taken to model dispersal. See Hoban et al. (2012) for a more comprehensive overview.

a) backward/forward b) x/y - coordinates c) Selection allowed d) dispersal
Aladyn forward For individuals, continuous resolution yes Stage dependent dispersal kernel
cdpop forward For individuals/populations, on the lattice yes Stepping stone with isolation by distance, sex-specific migration rate and influenced by environmental factors
Kernelpop forward For individuals, on the lattice no Dispersal kernel
Nemo forward For populations on the lattice yes Stepping stone with isolation by distance, sex-specific migration rate
Pedagog forward - yes Age and density dependent, sex-specific migration rate
QuantiNemo forward For populations on the lattice yes Density dependent, stepping stone, sex-specific migration rate
Splatche Forward and backward For populations on the lattice no Stepping stone model, migration influenced by environmental factors