Table 5.
Comparison of assembly with and without clustering preprocess ( k =3, 2 clusters)
Distance | Mapped contigs | N50 | Number of contigs | Genome coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|
No Clustering | 93.55% | 112 | 22823 | 0,828 |
AQP q-red | 94.13% | 141 | 29421 | 0,920 |
93.97% | 138 | 28701 | 0,914 | |
L 2 | 94.24% | 135 | 28297 | 0,904 |
KL | 94.19% | 135 | 28171 | 0,903 |
Symm, KL | 94.27% | 134 | 27999 | 0,902 |
D 2 | 94.33% | 134 | 28019 | 0,903 |
The assembly with Velvet is evaluated in terms of mapped contigs, N50, number of contigs and genome coverage. The dataset used is SRR017901 (23.5M bases, 10x coverage) that contains reads of Zymomonas mobilis. Best results are in bold.