Table 3.
Square-Root Transformed Subscale |
Effect | Study Group |
Correlate |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex |
IQ |
Adaptive Behavior |
Vineland-II Communication |
Age (Years) |
|||
F(1,655) | F(1,643) | F(1,523) | F(1,492) | F(1,415) | F(1,653) | ||
Verbal Aggression | Group | 16.69* | 18.56* | 7.66* | 14.02* | 12.51* | 21.96* |
Predictor | 0.53 | 17.26*, a | 0.31 | 1.09 | 37.55*, a | ||
Group x Predictor | 2.45 | 2.61 | 5.49 | 8.18* | 7.39* | ||
R2 | .03 | .03 | .07 | .03 | .05 | .12 | |
Bullying | Group | 21.66* | 28.08* | 15.35* | 14.11* | 8.05* | 27.99* |
Predictor | 0.59 | 0.22 | 11.83*, b | 2.67 | 22.11*, b | ||
Group x Predictor | 6.35 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 1.16 | 12.81* | ||
R2 | .03 | .04 | .04 | .05 | .01 | .07 | |
Covert Aggression | Group | 23.00* | 24.85* | 13.83* | 20.76* | 15.60* | 15.91* |
Predictor | 0.29 | 16.71*, a | 3.44 | 0.03 | 21.37*, a | ||
Group x Predictor | 3.93 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 4.16 | 2.77 | ||
R2 | .03 | .04 | .07 | .04 | .05 | .09 | |
Hostility | Group | 7.84* | 9.94* | 3.88 | 8.23* | 5.01 | 14.38* |
Predictor | 0.01 | 5.50 | 4.87 | 0.10 | 2.55 | ||
Group x Predictor | 2.61 | 0.43 | 0.09 | 1.17 | 7.15* | ||
R2 | .01 | .02 | .03 | .02 | .01 | .04 | |
Physical Aggression | Group | 13.48* | 20.15* | 11.96* | 8.69* | 9.25* | 21.84* |
Predictor | 0.01 | 3.20 | 13.39*, b | 12.46*, b | 26.11*, b | ||
Group x Predictor | 6.47 | 0.63 | 1.20 | 1.46 | 11.78* | ||
R2 | .02 | .03 | .04 | .04 | .04 | .06 | |
CBCL Aggressionc | Group | 29.25* | 20.86* | 18.77* | 22.14* | 14.94* | 21.49* |
Predictor | 0.05 | 0.37 | 15.87*, b | 10.36*, b | 9.28*, b | ||
Group x Predictor | 0.19 | 3.60 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 5.73 | ||
R2 | .06 | .06 | .08 | .09 | .07 | .08 |
p < 0.01
Low values on predictor associated with lower aggression scores.
Low values on predictor associated with higher aggression scores.
df for CBCL Aggression were as follows (by column): Study Group (1,466), Sex (1,455), IQ (1,396), Adaptive Behavior (1,356), Vineland-II Communication, (1,326), Age (1,465).
Note: All significant main effects of Study Group were in the direction of lower scores for ASD than for non-ASD comparison group.