Table 2.
Individual-Level Correlations and Descriptive Data
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Mastery | ― | |||||||||
| 2. Purpose | .58*** | ― | ||||||||
| 3. Esteem | .62*** | .72*** | ― | |||||||
| 4. Attendance | .12 | .10 | .01 | ― | ||||||
| 5. Leadership | .20* | .15 | .17* | .28** | ― | |||||
| 6. Victimization | −.25** | −.18* | −.18* | .04 | −.02 | ― | ||||
| 7. GSA support | .08 | .16* | .07 | .34*** | .15 | .19* | ― | |||
| 8. GSA advocacy | −.17 | −.03 | −.10 | −.06 | −.07 | .14 | .31*** | ― | ||
| 9. Advisor support | −.08 | .12 | .07 | .32*** | .18* | .24** | .50*** | .27** | ― | |
| 10. Advisor control | −.11 | −.09 | −.18* | .10 | −.16 | −.06 | .04 | .02 | −.02 | ― |
Note. GSA = Gay-Straight Alliances; Mastery = sense of mastery; Purpose = sense of purpose; Esteem = self-esteem; Attendance = frequency of GSA attendance; Leadership = holding a leadership position (dichotomous; 1 = yes); Victimization = peer victimization; GSA support = perceived support received from the GSA; GSA advocacy = perceived level of GSA advocacy; Advisor support = perceived support from GSA advisor; Advisor control = perceived level of control of the GSA advisor in decision-making.
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.
***
p < .001.