Table 9.
We conducted one side two-sample t-test between each two methods under the confidence level of 95%. In this chart we showed the P value of the test in which the method's mean in the row was smaller than that in the column. We arranged the methods according to their rank. The events in the symmetric position of the table were complementary, so we just showed the bold font data. We could see MIC passed 5 tests, which performed best.
| MIC | CF | MI | WCF | PCF | CH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | 0.7668 | 0.9556 | 0.9757 | >0.9999 | >0.9999 | |
| CF | 0.8277 | 0.9011 | 0.9999 | >0.9999 | ||
| MI | 0.6796 | 0.9998 | >0.9999 | |||
| WCF | 0.9984 | >0.9999 | ||||
| PCF | 0.9870 | |||||
| CH |