Table 3.
CDI evaluation results (best run per team only).
| Row | Team | P | R | F 1 | SDs | Range | Group | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 231 | 87.02% | 89.41% | 88.20% | 0.30% | A-C | 1 | 1 |
| B | 184 | 91.28% | 85.24% | 88.15% | 0.34% | A-C | 1 | 2 |
| C | 198 | 89.34% | 86.51% | 87.90% | 0.33% | A-D | 2 | 3 |
| D | 173 | 87.81% | 87.24% | 87.52% | 0.33% | C-D | 3 | 4 |
| E | 179 | 87.58% | 84.86% | 86.20% | 0.36% | E-F | 4 | 5 |
| F | 233 | 86.03% | 85.45% | 85.74% | 0.35% | E-F | 4 | 6 |
| G | 197 | 86.35% | 82.37% | 84.31% | 0.35% | G-G | 5 | 7 |
| H | 185 | 82.77% | 83.19% | 82.98% | 0.38% | H-H | 6 | 8 |
| I | 245 | 83.35% | 75.38% | 79.17% | 0.41% | I-I | 7 | 9 |
| J | 199 | 84.91% | 71.46% | 77.61% | 0.46% | J-K | 8 | 10 |
| K | 222 | 84.55% | 71.65% | 77.57% | 0.46% | J-K | 8 | 11 |
| L | 214 | 86.40% | 68.77% | 76.58% | 0.47% | L-M | 9 | 12 |
| M | 207 | 81.24% | 71.07% | 75.82% | 0.46% | L-N | 10 | 13 |
| N | 217 | 73.44% | 77.25% | 75.30% | 0.42% | M-N | 11 | 14 |
| O | 267 | 72.65% | 75.86% | 74.22% | 0.45% | O-O | 12 | 15 |
| P | 219 | 79.11% | 66.13% | 72.04% | 0.46% | P-Q | 13 | 16 |
| Q | 265 | 83.85% | 62.40% | 71.55% | 0.48% | P-Q | 13 | 17 |
| R | 238 | 76.49% | 64.96% | 70.25% | 0.56% | R-R | 14 | 18 |
| S | 191 | 80.99% | 58.28% | 67.78% | 0.49% | S-T | 15 | 19 |
| T | 196 | 57.66% | 81.48% | 67.53% | 0.38% | S-T | 15 | 20 |
| U | 177 | 62.11% | 70.20% | 65.91% | 0.47% | U-U | 16 | 21 |
| V | 182 | 60.31% | 57.36% | 58.79% | 0.49% | V-V | 17 | 22 |
| W | 225 | 60.80% | 53.09% | 56.69% | 0.50% | W-W | 18 | 23 |
P: precision; R: recall, F1: F-score, SDs: standard deviation in the bootstrap samples.