Table 3.
Results for CEM task per chemical entity subtype.
| Setup | ABBR | FAMI | FORM | IDEN | MULT | SYST | TRIV | NONE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 0.8768 | 0.8216 | 0.8199 | 0.8323 | 0.3969 | 0.9136 | 0.9013 | 0.7073 |
| Model 2 | 0.8285 | 0.7871 | 0.8393 | 0.8615 | 0.4824 | 0.9196 | 0.8783 | 0.6829 |
| Naïve combination | 0.9132 | 0.8799 | 0.8936 | 0.9005 | 0.5326 | 0.9588 | 0.9403 | 0.7804 |
| Heuristic combination | 0.8837 | 0.8440 | 0.8318 | 0.8986 | 0.4020 | 0.9276 | 0.9273 | 0.7804 |
| High recall combination | 0.9137 | 0.9006 | 0.8809 | 0.8752 | 0.6030 | 0.9525 | 0.9414 | 0.7560 |
Results for the CEM task for each experimental setup on each chemical entity subtype, as measured by micro-averaged recall.