Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 21;16(Suppl 1):S9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-16-S1-S9

Table 7.

Performance comparison with previous studies using a partial dataset.

Tool Positive dataset/negative dataset TP TN FP FN SN SP ACC Balanced ACC MCC
Triplet-SVM 44 171 18 19 69.84% 90.47% 85.32% 80.15% 0.61


MiPred 41 175 14 22 65.07% 92.59% 85.71% 78.83% 0.60


miPred 42 177 12 21 66.66% 93.65% 86.90% 80.16% 0.64


miR-KDE 63/189 39 176 13 24 61.90% 93.18% 85.31% 77.51% 0.59


microPred 48 159 30 15 76.54% 84.12% 82.14% 80.16% 0.56


MiRenSVM 45 161 28 18 71.45% 85.21% 81.75% 78.30% 0.54


miR-BAG 46 166 23 17 73.01% 87.83% 84.13% 80.42% 0.59


Our approach 50 164 25 13 79.36% 86.77% 84.92% 83.06% 0.63