Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 18;6:130. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00130

Table 2.

Mean estimates of alpha diversity metrics (mean ± S.D., p-values) calculated for each method from OTU tables rarefied to 11,739 sequences per sample.

Method Chao1 Observed OTUs Shannon diversity Simpson diversity
HMP 842 ± 64.9 (p = 1.0) 533 ± 44.8 (p = 0.32) 5.28 ± 0.41 (p = 0.01) 0.90 ± 0.04 (p = 0.02)
M 818 ± 90.1 (p = 0.33) 528 ± 46.0 (p = 0.04) 5.18 ± 0.64 (p = 0.01) 0.87 ± 0.09 (p = 0.02)
P 825 ± 61.4 (p = 0.24) 524 ± 38.4 (p = 0.02) 5.19 ± 0.52 (p = 0.01) 0.89 ± 0.07 (p = 0.01)
Q 825 ± 87.3 (p = 0.52) 531 ± 48.8 (p = 0.16) 5.13 ± 0.69 (p = 0.01) 0.87 ± 0.09 (p = 0.01)
Z 865 ± 61.0 562 ± 42.6 5.94 ± 0.30 0.94 ± 0.03

Each method represents data from 27 samples. P-values reported in the table are only associated with pairwise comparisons with Z method. No other pairwise comparisons between methods resulted in significant p-values (p < 0.05).